Archive for the ‘Artwrite Issue 47, Master of Art Administration students Semester 2, 2011’ Category

Editorial

Wednesday, October 19th, 2011

Welcome to Artwrite #47. Artwrite is a collaborative student-run magazine produced by Art Administration students at the College of Fine Arts, UNSW.

In this edition, our writers delve deep into issues of accessibility in the arts. ‘Community engagement’, ‘social inclusion’ and ‘diversifying and developing audiences’ are phrases increasingly used by practicing arts professionals everywhere, and we examine just what is being done both locally, and globally, to bring about such changes.

Our features discuss both sides of the issue and range from explorations of local artist-run-initiatives, to the alternative use of public space for art events such as Sydney’s Festival of Free Spaces. Photographer Dean Sewell openly discusses illegal guerrilla art in a bold interview with Renay Ringma and we consider why contemporary art spaces are still associated with notions of exclusivity and elitism.

This edition also reviews a diverse range of exhibitions, from the Art Gallery of New South Wales’ current blockbuster Mad Square: Modernity in Modern Art, to the public display of private art in White Rabbit’s Beyond the Frame. Also under the spotlight are Penrith Regional Gallery’s New Acquisitions in context and Bronek Kozka’s Memory, Myth and the 1/4 Acre Block.

The efforts of our fellow students must be acknowledged. Without their effort and ingenuity this edition of Artwrite would not have been possible. Every student in the class joined in the sub-editing and they all committed to working cohesively to ensure each article is at its absolute best.

Special thanks also go to Joanna Mendelssohn for pushing us to our creative limits and teaching us the importance of meeting deadlines — a lesson we all learned quickly, and ultimately, the reason we were able to produce a publication we are all proud to be a part of in such a short space of time.

We can only hope you enjoy browsing through the assorted collection of articles, reviews, opinion letters and short kids pieces assembled here.

A PDF version of this edition is currently in production, guided by the exceptional design finesse of Dale Maxwell-Smith, David Lyndon and Gokcen Altinok. It will be archived in the UNSW library under UNSWorks.

Megan Hillyer & Nina Pether, Editors, Artwrite #47

Contributors

Wednesday, October 19th, 2011

This issue of Artwrite has been produced by Associate Professor Joanna Mendelssohn’s students in the Art Administration course Writing for different cultures and audiences.

Gokcen Altinok

Aleema Ash

Amy Bortolazzo

Margarett Cortez

Elisha Donath

Amalie Frederiksen

Skye Gibson

Simonette Gill

Megan Hillyer

Anna Lutkajtis

Anna Lumsden

David Lyndon

Elka Okawa

Nina Pether

Renay Ringma

Dale Maxwell-Smith

Sophie Todd

Marietta Zafirakos

Editors

Megan Hillyer, Nina Pether

Section Editors

Elisha Donath, Skye Gibson, Anna Lumsden, Sophie Todd, Marietta Zafirakos

Copy Editors

Gokcen Altinok, Aleema Ash, Amy Bortolazzo, Margarett Cortez, Elisha Donath, Amalie Frederiksen, Skye Gibson, Simonette Gill, Megan Hillyer, Anna Lutkajtis, Anna Lumsden, David Lyndon, Elka Okawa, Nina Pether, Renay Ringma, Dale Maxwell-Smith, Sophie Todd, Marietta Zafirakos

PDF Team

Gokcen Altinok, David Lyndon, Dale Maxwell-Smith

Copyright clearance

Aleema Ash, Renay Ringma

Images check

Amy Bortolazzo, Margarett Cortez

Special Acknowledgements

Dean Sewell

Tamara Dean

White Rabbit Gallery

Art Gallery of New South Wales

Roslyn Oxley9, Sydney

Bronek Kozka

Niagara Galleries, Melbourne

Serial Space

Fran Barrett

Tom Smith

Valentina Schlute

Arthouse Gallery, Sydney

Virginia Wilson

Barbara Flynn

Maria Poulos

Helen Burton

Chris Lego

Jennifer Dooley

Leonie Reisberg

Lily Slade

Contents Artwrite 47

Wednesday, October 19th, 2011

Contents

Features

The Contemporary Art Gallery: equal access for all? — Aleema Ash

The Real National Cultural Policy Debate — Dale Maxwell-Smith

Why Art Goes Underground — Renay Ringma

The Festival of Free Spaces — Amy Bortolazzo

Australia could benefit from some therapy — Anna Lumsden

Sao Paulo Museum of Art cries for help — Elka Okawa

Addressing the problem of an empty life in a developed consumer economy — Margarett Cortez

The art of corporate identity — Nina Pether

Reviews

We’ve lost our good old mama — David Lyndon

Beyond the storage space: White Rabbit’s Beyond the Frame — Megan Hillyer

The Mad Square: Impact of the Nazis — Marietta Zafriakos

500

Politics on Display — Skye Gibson

Del Kathryn Barton – satellite fade-out — Anna Lutkajtis

The sculptor who challenged everything — Renay Ringma

Performance artist runs rings around the rest — Megan Hillyer

A world of unknown becomes everyone’s story — Gokcen Altinok

When past and present goes hand in hand — Amelie Frederiksen

Kids Corner

Dean Home — Nina Pether

At the beach with Narelle Autio — Sophie Todd

Dianne Jones — Elisha Donath

Tracey Moffatt: Inspiration and Creativity — Amy Bortolazzo

Letters to the Editor

A recess break seems tokenistic! — Anna Lumsden

Think green, think creative, think community, think Chippendale — Sophie Todd

Blockbusters all used to be like Titanic, and then there was Inception — Margarett Cortez

Bye Bye Wonderland — Skye Gibson

Listen Up or Scroll Down — Gokcen Altinok

Howl — David Lyndon

The Contemporary Art Gallery: equal access for all?

Wednesday, October 19th, 2011

By Aleema Ash

Five guards dressed in crisp police-like uniforms stand tall, dotted evenly across the entry foyer.  Their eyes follow my every move through the large glass doors as I enter their terrain. A guard storms up to me and tells me that I have to check in my bag in as it is larger than the accepted 30x30cm dimensions. I reluctantly hand over it over and receive a number printed on laminated card that smells mildly of disinfectant. My plastic water bottle is confiscated and thrown into the rubbish bin. I move away from the desk and once again the guard’s eyes fix on my every move. I pretend I know what I am doing and where I am going but I can’t remember the last time I visited an art gallery. There are no signs in sight and I am lost but I don’t dare ask for directions. My footsteps echo in the large atrium that spans 3 levels. People gaze down from the floors above. Are they staring at me? They look so at ease. I feel small a dot in a large, unfamiliar, open space. I mutter under my breath ‘this place is not for people like me‘ and I return to the bag check, hand over my ticket, collect my bag and exit the building all under the watchful eye of the guards.

Accessibility, community engagement, and cultural diversity are terms that have been central to Australian political debate over the past three decades. This has resulted in the formation of a number of government cultural development policies prompting Australian cultural institutions (public art galleries, museums, libraries, and heritage organisations) to provide equal access to services for all citizens. According to Richard Sandell, Head of Museum Studies at the University of Leicester, cultural institutions and more specifically, art galleries are paying increased attention to their audience by focusing on ‘representation, access and participation’. There is now emphasis placed on attracting traditionally under-represented groups including ethnic minorities, physical and intellectually disabled people, economically disadvantaged communities and the old and the young. Many art galleries are allocating significant resources to audience research in an effort to better understand their visitors and identify barriers that exclude certain groups from visiting their institutions. Through these findings potential audiences are identified and appropriate programs and initiatives are being developed to target these groups. However, despite these recent developments there is little evidence to suggest that the ‘typical’ visitor to public art galleries in Australia has changed. As stated by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (2011), the research findings vary, yet overwhelmingly the ‘typical’ visitor is well educated, English speaking and middle class.

The Australian Council for the Arts confirmed last year that there is still a large portion of the population who consider art galleries to be inaccessible, irrelevant and elitist. The real or perceived barriers to visiting the art gallery are complex and interrelated and include, but are not limited to: external or situational factors (physical barriers, cost and timing); personal factors (personal feeling, perceptions of the experience being irrelevant, unwelcoming, challenging, ‘not for me’); and product specific factors (cost of attending; the physical location; limited information being provided; signage; frontline staff). As evident in the introductory narrative, the visitor experience can be negatively impacted by a number of factors indicating that a successful strategy requires an integrated approach across all departments (marketing, education, public programs, design and frontline staff).

Who are these ‘people like me’?

According to the Australian Bureau of Statistic’s report in 2010,  the number of Australians attending art galleries is increasing steadily with 25% of Australians’ (aged 15 years and over) visiting a public art gallery in 2009-10 compared with 23% in 2005-6. The figures also show that participation increases dramatically for higher income groups with higher educational status. According to the report, those who have never visited an art gallery (non-visitors) are overwhelmingly represented by lower income earners who left school before completing grade twelve. Non-visitors are also more likely to be male, have English as a second language (ESL), and reside in regional areas. These findings demonstrate that irrespective of recent art policies and cultural initiatives, visiting art museums remains a fairly restricted social practice.

A recent study conducted by this year by The Australian Council for the Arts notes that while Australian’s perceptions towards the arts are becoming more positive, there are still strongly held beliefs that the arts ‘requires understanding to appreciate them fully’, and that arts ‘attract people who are somewhat elitist or pretentious’. Efforts to breakdown the elitist image and consequently increase participation in under-represented groups have not made a significant impact to the ‘typical’ or ‘regular’ visitor profile. It seems that public art galleries, although offering free entry, maintain the illusion of democratic access, while in practice they still cater for the visitor who is well educated, English speaking and middle class.

Breaking down the barriers for ‘people like me’

Are museums forever destined to reinforce class and cultural structures? Or can they break down barriers and become more socially inclusive? In addressing this problem, public art galleries have initiated a number of strategies to try and attract ‘non-visitors’ to the gallery.

One such example is the Queensland Art Gallery’s recent exhibition 21st Century: Art in the First Decade (December-April 2011). The exhibition was a free-entry, collection-based show surveying contemporary art of the last decade. The exhibition occupied the entire Gallery of Modern Art (GoMA) with more than 200 works by over 140 artists from more than 40 countries.  21st Century: Art in the First Decade had broad appeal with a number of large-scale participatory works that could be easily interpreted and enjoyed by a range of audiences without prior contemporary art knowledge. This was particularly evident with the Carsten Höller Left/Right Slide that had a strong presence in the large entry foyer of GoMA. The two spiral slides spanned three levels of the gallery and allowed kids and adults to slide down what the artist calls the ‘happiness producing machine’.  Visitors were also invited to sit down and collaboratively build a giant white Lego city in Olafur Eliasson’s The cubic structural evolution project 2004, take a wish from Rivane Neuenschwander colourful ribbon wall, I wish your wish, and enjoy a coffee in the Internet Memes lounge – located prominently in the exhibition space – before exploring the other 197 works. GoMA was alive and buzzing with the sound of laughter and sheer excitement echoing throughout the building. This exhibition painted a very different picture to the visitor experience evoked in the introductory narrative. There was not a guard in sight and staff were dressed in exhibition branded t-shirts positioned throughout the entry foyer loaded with information brochures.

The show attracted unprecedented attendance figures with over 451,041 visitors over a 20 week period (despite being closed for 5 weeks during the Brisbane January floods). Tony Ellwood (2010), Director of the Queensland Art Gallery commented ‘the exhibition demonstrated that contemporary art in the twenty-first century was a very inclusive and varied experience, engaging the widest possible public through ideas, direct experience, spectacle and narrative’. To assist different audiences with interpreting the exhibition, multiple platforms were utilized to connect audiences with contemporary art and ideas in ways which were meaningful and relevant. The various platforms included: interactive and online engagement through the comprehensive website, social media sites, live webcasts, exhibition-specific blog and iPhone applications; didactics panels (adults and children-specific), and a suite of publications (adult and children-specific); extensive public programs including artist talks and workshops; volunteer guided tours; targeted education programs including MyGen 50+ and New Wave Teens; three cinema programs; and the extensive Kids program including the 10 day Kids Festival. By offering multiple modes of interpretation the exhibition spoke, using the words of sociologist Nick Prior, to the ‘critic as well as the tourist, the artist as well as the ‘ordinary visitor’ and in its design it strived for ‘interpretation’ and ‘contemplation’ as well as ‘spectacle’ and ‘experience’’.

Perhaps because of its popularity, the exhibition received mixed reviews. Whilst some welcomed the broad appeal and hailed the participatory nature of the exhibition, others criticised the Queensland Art Gallery for turning contemporary art into ‘mass entertainment’. Christopher Allen, the Australian’s conservative art critic, emphasised this, ‘it is a kind of achievement to lure such people from the shopping centre to the art gallery, but they have to be entertained with gimmicks and bright colours…The [exhibition] lacks real thinking’. As stated in Rosemary Neil’s article in the Australian, to this Ellwood responded: ‘there are a lot of people who seem to think that engaging children, and large numbers of teenagers, young adults in their 20s, is something to be dismissive of . . . I see 20-year-olds walking in with their mates, by choice — I’m just proud of that…they sense that there’s an inclusiveness and a welcome here that other people seem to find almost irritating’.

There’s still work to be done to welcome ‘people like me’.

Public art galleries, like other cultural institutions, have experienced rapid change over the past three decades requiring new management approaches and evolving work practices (Sandell, 1998). Increased pressure by the government has required public arts institutions to become more inclusive, more accessible and communal. There are some significant efforts being made by public art galleries to actively broaden their appeal and attract diverse audiences (an example of this being GoMA’s 21st Century: Art in the First Decade exhibition). However, these efforts do not go without harsh criticism from the media and other arts professionals.

As indicated by the statistics presented by the ABS and the Australian Council for the Arts there is still a lot of work to be done before art gallery’s become truly socially inclusive.  While it is essential for museums to invest in audience research and develop strategies to prevent negative audience experiences, in the end it will need to be a collaborative effort between the arts sector professionals, government, media and the community. It will take time, effort and commitment to shed the traditional image of ‘elitism’ and ‘exclusion’ and ensure that ‘people like me’ feel welcome to roam freely within the public art gallery. Whether or not this can become a reality remains to be seen.

Further Reading

Allen, C. (2011, April 09). Carnival capers. The Australian. Retrieved from: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/arts/carnival-capers/story-e6frg8n6-1226033122793

Australian Bureau of Statistics (2011). Perspectives on Culture: Art Gallery and Museum Attendances. Retrieved from: http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Latestproducts/4172.0.55.001
Main%20Features3March%202011?opendocument&tabname=Summary&prodno=4172.0.55.001&issue=
March%202011&num=&view=n

Australia Council for the Arts. (2010). More than bums on seats: Australian Participation in the Arts. Retrieved from: http://www.australiacouncil.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/71256/
Australian_Participation_in_the_Arts_summary.pdf

Ballantyne, R. Uzzell, D. (2011). Looking Back and Looking Forward: The Rise of the Visitor-centred Museum. Curator The Museum Journal, 54(1), 85-92

Black, Graham. (2010). Embedding Civil Engagement in museums. Museum Management and Curatorship, 25 (2), 129-146.

Hooper-Greenhill, E. (1994). Museum and Gallery Education. Working with the whole community. Leicester University Press: Leicester, London and New York.

McCall, V. (2009). Social Policy and Cultural Services: A Study of Scottish Border Museums as Implementers of Social Inclusion. Social Policy & Society. 8(3), 319-331.

Neill, R. (2011, July 02). Mass appeal. The Australian. Retrieved from: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/arts/mass-appeal/story-e6frg8n6-1226084238179

Prior, N. (2003). Having One’s Tate and Eating It: Transformations of the Museum in a Hypermodern Era. In McClellan, A. (Ed). Art and its Publics: Museum Studies at the Millennium (pp.51-74). Blackwell Publishing: Oxford.

Queensland Art Gallery. (2010). 21st Century: Art in the First Decade. http://qag.qld.gov.au/exhibitions/past/2010/21st_Century

Sandell, R. (1998). Museums as Agents of Social Inclusion. Museum Management and Curatorship, 17(4) 401-418

Zolberg, V. (1994). “An Elite Experience for Everyone”: Art Museums, the Public and Cultural Literacy. In Sherman, D. Rogoff, I. (Eds). Museum Cultures: Histories, Discourses, Spectacles (pp. 49-65). Minnesota: The University of Minnesota Press.

The Real National Cultural Policy Debate

Wednesday, October 19th, 2011

By Dale Maxwell-Smith

As the Federal Government calls for submissions on the proposed National Cultural Policy, now is an ideal time to talk about cultural policy in Australia.

This is an opportunity to contribute to the cultural policy that will shape government decisions for the next 10 years. A chance to consider and debate whether Australian arts and culture are headed in the right direction and what is required of a National Cultural Policy.

For many years the cries of the arts and heritage sector have gone unheard. Despite the fact that the creative and cultural industries contribute more to the national GDP than industries such as fishing, forestry or agriculture there has been no guiding policy to direct government support and funding.

The last time Australia had a cultural policy was Keating’s Creative Nation almost two decades ago. To put this in perspective, when the last cultural policy was released in 1994, the potential of the Internet as a forum for arts and culture had not even been dreamt of. This is long before Google, Youtube, blogs, or social networking sites.

The Internet is not the only major change in this time. The cultural neglect of the Howard era has meant that for 11 years government policy and funding failed to keep pace with the changing needs of artists and audiences. The result has been seriously detrimental to Australian culture.

Many individuals, organisations and communities have battled on despite government disinterest and chronic underfunding. Their efforts have kept the sector alive but there is room for vast improvement. Put simply, there is a lot of catching up to do.

In 2009 the Labour Government announced it would be delivering on its election promise to develop a new national cultural policy. The announcement was greeted with enthusiasm by many of those in the arts but as yet we are still waiting for the final policy.

Industry support groups such as National Association for Visual Artists (NAVA) have long been advocating for a national cultural policy. NAVA together with many other organisations, including the Arts Law Centre of Australia and the Council for the Humanities Arts and Social Sciences, made detailed submissions to previous Arts Minister, Peter Garrett, in 2010. It is these initial submissions that inform the current draft policy.

Simon Crean, current Minister for the Arts, released the National Cultural Policy Discussion Papers on the 11th of August 2011, inviting Australians to make submissions in a second round of consultation, before the final Policy is released in 2012. Also recently released are the Strategic Digital Industry Plan: Creative Industries, a Strategy for 21st Century Australia, the Review of the Protection of Movable Cultural Heritage Act 1986 and Regulations, the National Arts and Disability Strategy and the Convergence Review Discussion Papers.

This recent spate of policy papers, discussion papers, submissions and reviews has left many wondering if the Government will ever stop producing documents long enough to implement any of the policies. But there is a reason for this seemingly endless consultation process. As the slow moving bureaucratic machine finally takes the arts seriously and the wheels of change are set in motion, there are a lot of creases to iron out.

All this talk will not necessarily solve the problem, but considering how long the arts and culture have been ignored these discussions are a good starting point. To be fair, the current Government has done more than just talk about the arts. The Government has made important advances by introducing resale royalty rights and redrafting the sedition laws, which were in danger of restricting artistic freedom. They have also increased Federal arts funding, providing much needed support for new grants and programs. Unfortunately for NSW, this new funding comes at a time when their State Government is cutting small arts grants funding and film funding.

So where does that leave the National Cultural Policy? The proposed cultural policy does not address Australian culture as a whole but a narrower definition of culture, specifically core arts, creative industries and cultural heritage. While cultural economist, Professor Throsby makes a strong case for a general cultural policy addressing an overarching approach to culture, this kind of policy is beyond the scope of current review.

Reactions to the Discussion Paper have been mixed and many individuals and organisations are still preparing their responses. Cultural commentators have described the papers as naïve, limited, ‘thin on details’, even ‘content-less gobbledygook’. What the Paper does address is the need for the arts to reflect modern Australia, the importance of Indigenous heritage, support for innovation in ideas and technologies, increased access and participation, assistance for those who excel in their field, international engagement, and increased social and economic engagement with other sectors: all admirable aims.

The naysayers have a point. The four goals of the Paper do appear to be a mishmash of different ideas bundled together.

Ben Eltham, writing for ‘Crikey’, Arts policy converging into a government hash’, quotes an unnamed senior state government arts policy advisor admitting ‘the goals are a bit of a dog’s breakfast’ and many would agree. Four goals for culture for the next 10 years is far too limited. It sounds like someone decided four goals would be a good structure and then set about squashing as many of the cultural needs of Australia as they could into those few bullet points. A brief look at the wording of the goals themselves and the problems become clear.

Goal 1. ‘To ensure that what the Government supports — and how this support is provided — reflects the diversity of a 21st century Australia, and protects and supports Indigenous Culture.’

Australia’s rich aboriginal heritage is an integral part of its diversity. This goal however is the only one to mention Indigenous Australians directly and it does so by tacking the entire issue on to the end of another aim. It is widely recognised that the concerns facing Indigenous arts and culture are extremely complex and unique. These issues need to be addressed specifically rather than as an add-on to general ideas of diversity. For example, the Paper identifies indigenous language as an area requiring a policy of ‘maintenance and revival’ yet this is not mentioned once in the goal relating to Indigenous Australians.

Goal 2. ‘To encourage the use of emerging technologies and new ideas that support the development of new artworks and the creative industries, and that enable more people to access and participate in arts and culture.’

By combining these objectives, the issue of participation becomes secondary to that of innovation. Increased participation through innovation sounds great but what about methods that have been successful in the past? It is important to focus on participation as a goal in itself. The mainstream focus of the Paper acknowledges the concerns of the arts and cultural industries about the need to encourage more participation and at the same time quotes the ABS statistic of 90% participation in culture without question. This statistic is misleading. It includes watching television and films as arts participation. A policy that aims to promote Australian culture needs to take into account local content. It should also give less weight to such passive forms of cultural consumption, given that the social and economic benefits referred to in the paper relate almost exclusively to active participation.

Goal 3. ‘To support excellence and world-class endeavour, and strengthen the role that the arts play in telling Australian stories both here and overseas.’

The only benchmarks of excellence provided are Academy and Grammy awards. Most people would recognise that these awards do not necessarily relate to excellence in the arts but rather commercial success. Promoting Australian stories is a commendable objective that will succeed through support for touring and international exposure. Celebrities in line for major industry awards are not where funding should be focused. Nor should celebrity status be seen as necessary for artistic success. Excellence should be encouraged through recognition of developed skills and ingenuity as well as for exceptional arts projects and community engagement.

Goal 4. ‘To increase and strengthen the capacity of the arts to contribute to our society and economy.’

This goal encompasses an extensive array of objectives. Among those mentioned in the paper are the role of education in the arts and the connection of arts and culture to other sectors and government initiatives. One key area in realising the goal has been ignored. The role of support agencies such as NAVA and the Arts Law Council is essential to strengthening the arts. These types of organisations are critically underfunded and many other smaller organisations rely exclusively on the work of volunteers. Without increased funding to such organisations, the benefits of developing better policy and increased legal protection for artists and cultural producers will be limited.

Many other challenges remain for the policy to overcome.

Although more Australians than ever are engaging with arts and culture, the view that the arts are elitist remains prevalent. As a country with vast regional and rural areas, access remains a very real issue. The division of powers and funding by federal, state, and local government who traditionally share responsibility for promotion of the arts means that for the policy to succeed a high level of cooperation is required.

The omission of any mention of copyright law in the paper is a mystery. Simon Crean has said that as intellectual property policy falls under the umbrella of the Attorney General’s department, it is not within the scope of the National Cultural Policy. A policy which relies on collaboration yet does not have the support of other departments is cause for serious concern. Other Arts Ministry publications, such as the Strategic Digital Industry Plan, are able to engage with intellectual property concerns, calling into question the government’s commitment to a National Cultural Policy.

The Minister for the Arts has also admitted that at this point no extra funding is planned to implement the policy. Whilst better allocation of existing funds in line with an overall guiding policy is essential it will not solve the problem of underfunding. In a country where defence spending is triple the entire spending of three levels of government on arts, culture and heritage including the ABC, community radio, and all public libraries, surely we can spare a few more dollars to kick start the new National Cultural Policy.

Taken as a whole, the paper presents some exciting areas for policy change. Australian arts and culture are finally beginning to command some of the attention they deserve. This is an opportunity to advocate for a stronger arts sector and better funding which our cultural industries desperately need.

The proposed policy is far from perfect but now is the chance to suggest improvements and be involved in insuring that the creative industries, core arts and cultural heritage are a required consideration in government decisions.

Further Reading

The National Cultural Policy Discussion Paper

http://culture.arts.gov.au/discussion-paper

NAVA

http://www.artshub.com.au

Ben Eltham, Arts policy converging into a government hash

http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/23/arts-policy-converging-into-a-government-hash/

Scott O’Hara, What’s a new National Cultural Policy for?

http://www.artshub.com.au

Helen O’Neil, Ratbags at the Gates

http://griffithreview.com

Why Art Goes Underground

Wednesday, October 19th, 2011

Portrait of Dean Sewell © Tamara Dean, 2004

By Renay Ringma

“I love that area that exists between the mainstream and the underground. I can do a guerrilla-esque type illegal sculpture installation and drive it through mainstream.”

We are sitting in the Courthouse. On the bench is one of Australia’s most awarded photographic artists.

Dean Sewell is admitting to illegally postering Sydney’s new Louis Vuitton building with 3.7 metre high black and white photographs.

Luckily the Courthouse we are in is a favourite watering hole, the Courthouse Hotel in Sydney’s inner west, because the Louis Vuitton confession isn’t the only one Sewell is making today.

Representation by Charles Hewitt Gallery, winning two consecutive Moran Contemporary Photographic Art Prizes and a forthcoming major exhibition at the Museum of Sydney has not softened Sewell’s activism.

Sewell talks about the restrictions of formal gallery spaces and why art goes underground.

Renay Ringma: What are some of the limitations of formal gallery spaces, whether commercial or traditional galleries?

Dean Sewell: Traditionally, guerrilla art just didn’t rate economically. A commercial gallery is economically driven. They’re there for a purpose, to sell work. If you go back 20 years, street art was not economically viable. It’s really taken a big swing because they realise its popularity.

In more traditional hoity-toity establishments, a guerrilla-esque artwork and the issues that it addresses are not the types of work that people are going to buy and put on their walls. People with money are conservative; they will go for the more conservative types of art. That’s probably the biggest limitation, is the economics of art.

RR: For artists who aren’t into political or challenging content, but still want to look outside of the gallery structure, is it economics?

DS: Big names, like Swoon, Banksy, Kill Pixie, people have seen how their work has transformed from just purely street work into thousands of dollars, millions of dollars in the case of Banksy.

So a lot of people are realising that there are opportunities for them to make a name, to gain exposure by putting their work on the street. It wasn’t an option years ago. But it’s changed so much now. One good example is a young Australian guy, Dan, who goes under the auspice of Ears. He started the Oh Really Gallery in Enmore. That’s now folded because he’s made that transition through street art into a mainstream gallery.

RR: So it’s a stepping-stone?

DS: Yeah. People see it as a really viable way to bypass the bullshit, like having to schmooze and piss in people’s pockets to make your entry through the commercial set; they use the streets as a canvas to gain recognition. If you can harness that recognition you’ll have people knocking on your door.

RR: Melbourne artist, Bianca Hester, who works a lot on the street, talks about [traditional] gallery models as violent – a totalising model that everyone has to fit into and as a result people bastardise their practice.

Do people adjust their practice to fit into the gallery framework?

DS: Eventually they all move over. They have to because you can’t have such a transient form, how do you make your money from it? Once you develop the reputation, it starts changing. It’s like a lot of street artists. Their stuff goes straight onto a wall. Once they get a reputation, all of a sudden it goes on the canvas because it has to sell.

“The visual arts can play a more important role than just satisfy one’s narcissistic tendencies.”

RR: Art takes on different attributes when it moves from a white-walled, white-cubed, formal space to where it’s competing with everyday life.

Is that attractive for you?

DS: Well I do things for different reasons. The visual arts can play a more important role than just satisfy one’s narcissistic tendencies.

Certain art forms belong more in the public domain than others. They’re more appropriate to be there because of the issues they’re addressing.

A lot of the stuff that ends up in galleries is purely aesthetic. It’s all that really drives it. There’s no greater meaning behind it. Of course they’ll spin it to give it meaning but that’s always post production. Essentially what people want and what they’re willing to pay for is just the aesthetic.

RR: You’ve done an illegal installation in Sydney Park, your [David Hicks] Hills Hoist installation. What was the attraction of doing that outside a formal gallery?

DS: I’m just not satisfied with being a passive observer on the sidelines of the political process. I want to be an active participant. I want to be able to influence people and counteract spin by governments.

The spin that we had on the Hicks issue was one that I just couldn’t tolerate. My purpose was to give people a moment of pause like a circuit breaker in the spin cycle to allow people to think about an issue.

I’m not going to get an installation like that in a high-end gallery. I’m not recognised as a sculptor or that type of artist. Imagine me trying to have a Hills Hoist put in the MCA? If I was the right person, sure.

So my only outlook is the public domain. But that’s where I want to be. I’ve got the opportunity there, to really influence public opinion. I can drive it through the media.

I love that area that exists between the mainstream and the underground. I can do a guerrilla-esque type illegal sculpture installation and drive it through mainstream.

RR: There’s lots of ways to do political protest but you’re utilising an extension of the medium that you’re familiar with. Is that because of comfort or because you know that’s going to get people’s attention?

DS: It’s the beauty of the visual arts. The visual arts can play a more important role in helping people to interpret complex political social environment issues. I’m just not happy leaving it up to the political flunkies, bureaucrats and spin doctors to tell us, this is how it is.

There’s a role in the visual arts and it goes beyond just the aesthetic. From the outset, I wanted to have a role in the political process. How could I do that? By having the ability to change public opinion through the visual medium.

'Howards's Dirty Laundry' - mixed media installation in Sydney Park 2006 by the ' Lonely Station ' collective to Protest the Howard Government's handling of David Hick's incarceration © Dean Sewell, 2006

RR: What is your experience of artist run initiatives that are either squatting in buildings or utilising buildings that are zoned for manufacturing or for other purposes. What’s the reason for them establishing?

DS: The collective really works. It helps just associating yourself with other people for lots of reasons. You bring a whole new audience to your work.

The two collectives that come to mind are Salmagundi and Tortuga Studios. They came about by the breakup of MEKanarky, which used to be in an old Streets ice-cream factory. They started as an anarchist art collective and had about 30 odd artists. When they split they couldn’t find a place big enough in Sydney to come together. So they formed two new entities.

“Let’s face it, how many anarchist art collectives are thriving in Paddington? Not a lot.”

RR: Is space the attraction for those communities or is it more monetary?

DS: Definitely monetary. 10 years ago there were a lot more collectives habituating the inner city. They’ve been pushed out.

The physicality of your immediate landscape is really beneficial to your practice as well. Let’s face it, how many anarchist art collectives are thriving in Paddington? Not a lot. That’s why industrial complexes are really good for collectives, like big warehouses, because you can have artists working all night with residents not complaining.

As cities rezone, it becomes harder and harder for big collectives to have spaces like that because they get pushed further and further afield to a point where it’s fine if you’re working in Campbelltown but how many people are going to go to Campbelltown for a night to see a show of relatively unknown artists? Not many.

RR: What are the implications?

DS: The truly creative people, the people that have real vision, they’ll always find a way to make things happen somewhere. But what happens is people are attracted to areas because they’re creative. But then they force out the very thing that attracted them there in the first place.

The creative side of things gets pushed to the peripheries.

We’ve lost heaps of collectives, little collectives because they got squeezed out of the inner West areas – like Redfern, Chippendale – those areas where all the warehouses are now converted into apartments.

RR: Frasers who are doing the Brewery site, are lobbying Council to retain studio space for artists and all the laneways around the area because that’s a selling point for them.

DS: Yeah. One of the actions we did was put some photos up on a building in town. It just looked so perfect, a complete empty façade. There were four photographers I got together to put up four big panels, at 4:30 in the morning, 3.7 metre black and white photos.

When we put it up we were hassled by the building site managers when they started work at 6:30 in the morning. The guy said to me, who’s your contact in the Council? I ended up saying Vivienne Westwood and the guy said, who’s that? He goes, do you realise who’s building this is? I said no. He said it’s the new Louis Vuitton building. Oh really, who’s he? He goes you don’t know who Louis Vuitton is? I said, well if you don’t know who Vivienne Westwood is…

So we got the hell out of there. The next day they had it all ripped down. But Louis Vuitton are now actively chasing us.

RR: They want you to reinstall?

DS: No, because they think that we’re some rogue advertising company that is riding off the back of them to push through some message. It was just art for art’s sake, nothing more. There was no political message behind it. We just thought it would be a good place to put some photos up and that was that. Now I feel like going back.

RR: I was going to ask, what’s your next illegal art act?

DS: Well it’s probably going to be that because funnily enough, I’ve got a show in the Museum of Sydney next year on culture jamming. So I figured it would nice to have something a bit more current.

RR: Can you tell me about that exhibition?

DS: It’s basically on a group of guys that was just starting a serious culture jamming group. I started documenting their works; it was all very political.

We call it second-generation art because you’re using what is an artwork already to create a secondary piece of art.

For me I actually crossed the line from observer to participant. I essentially morphed into what I was documenting. So some of the work is purely my own concept, ideas and creative process.

“The problem with the art world is they pigeon-hole you. You’re not allowed to step outside of that square without getting flogged.”

RR: You’ve had large exhibitions in very commercial galleries but at the same time you’re holding this underground illegal practice that gives you a very different voice.

DS: The problem with the art world is they pigeon-hole you. You’re not allowed to step outside of that square without getting flogged. So in the end my only means of doing certain types of artwork are outside of the formalised, gallery thing. Who’s going to run sculpture like I want to do or something with projections?

We had a little group, two or three of us; we used to call it the Guerrilla Projection Squad. We’d go round with a projector, laptop and generator and just set up anywhere and project onto the wall at night time.

Some nights it would be purely for art’s sake, just basically aesthetic. Other times it was really hard core political.

We had the Iraqi civilian death toll ticking over in real time on the wall in Darlinghurst with images of kids with their heads blown off with quotes from Howard saying, the most important civil liberty both you and I can have is be free from death and violence.

RR: That’s a good example of what Bianca Hester was saying, that galleries limit artists’ practice. You’re funnelled into the construct of the gallery and that’s a violation of your rights. So people explode sideways and go off and doing something that’s meaningful.

DS: Yeah, because really there’s not a lot of meaningful work that ends up in mainstream galleries. There’s just no place for it. Who’s going to buy it? Is anybody going to have a gallery in Woollahra with a picture of an Iraqi child with its head blown off on the wall?

Tamara Dean is represented by Tim Olsen Gallery, Sydney and James Makin Gallery, Melbourne

The Festival of Free Spaces

Wednesday, October 19th, 2011

I Love Free Parties © Jennifer Dooley, 2011

By Amy Bortolazzo

Sydney’s budding art and culture scene has generated a push for experimentation and innovation with artists increasingly moving beyond the traditional white walls of the gallery space. The use of empty, public spaces for temporary projects by artists in Sydney is rising and The Festival of Free Spaces, presented as part of The Sydney Fringe in September 2011, was a celebration of the endless possibilities available in the creative use of public space.

This artist-run initiative introduces creativity to forgotten public spaces within Sydney’s inner west. Chris Lego, an artist based in Newtown, produced the festival with assistance from a large collective of other Sydney based artists, writers and thinkers. Lego has been living in the inner west for over twelve years, and in that time, he has become an active contributor to its creative community. His first experience participating in a public cultural event was through the Reclaim the Streets parties, which first began to occur in Sydney in 1997. Since then, Lego’s involvement in organising public cultural events has evolved, and he is now behind other events, including the Newtown DIY Market, a very successful free market held every month as a platform for local art, culture and secondhand wares.

Artist-run initiatives are not for profit, artist run spaces that play a vital role in supporting emerging artists. In Australia, they emerged nationally in the 1970s as means of extending from the restrictions of public museums and commercial galleries. They create a platform for experimentation, innovative ideas and creativity that is unrestricted by commercial and public expectations, encouraging diversity and critical feedback. They are community based and the people that participate in them are extremely passionate about contemporary art, supporting independent artists and bringing innovative ideas to the community.

The recent symposium We Are Here, developed and run by the National Association for the Visual Arts (NAVA) and First Draft Gallery, one of Sydney’s longest running artist-run initiatives, acknowledged the important role that artist-run initiatives play in Australia. It took place from 1 – 4 September 2011 and featured a gathering of artists, curators and directors. Over 44 influential speakers presented various talks relating to the maintenance, growth, ideas and potential of the artist-run initiative in Australia. Brigid Noone, an Adelaide based independent artist and curator, presented ‘Space/No Space’, a talk which explored existing nomadic, project based, public and site-specific artist-run initiatives in Australia. Noone specifically examined the future sustainability of these projects for inner city artists. The use of public space is quickly becoming a viable option for artist-run initiatives and it benefits everyone involved, bringing culture and creativity to the wider community.

The Festival of Free Spaces makes an important statement about the use of public space. It highlights the importance of the use of it, how accessible it is and should be and questions the restrictions that are placed upon using it. Chris Lego stresses that common public space is extremely important and should be used more. However, the eternal fight for the use of it with public liability insurance and other restrictions means that many great ideas cannot go ahead. It is important for governments to realise that the unrestricted use of public space is essential in the development of culturally rich communities. The Festival of Free Spaces emphasises this. Making creative use of public space uncovers elements of a neighbourhood that are easily forgotten about. It celebrates communities and shows people what is possible with a little creativity. The festival is accessible to everyone, and engages with those outside the small arts community, something that is not necessarily possible for an art or cultural event held in an institution or gallery space.

Three main events made up the Festival of Free Spaces – Pop Up Festival, Artcore Guerilla Art Fair and Reclaim the Lanes. It was the first time that all three were brought together under one name, a fusion of previous ideas that had been developing throughout events in the inner west over recent years. Promotion around the festival was slightly secretive, as Lego believes it is exciting for people not to know exactly where an event will be held until a few hours beforehand. Artists and members of the local community have come together out of pure passion to bring free, accessible, fun and creative events to the public.

The Pop Up Festival on Friday 9 September was an unpredictable street celebration, occurring on the opening night of The Sydney Fringe. It celebrated the culture and spirit of the inner west and kick-started a month of performance, music and visual arts as part of The Sydney Fringe. Last year was the first time the Pop Up Festival was run, drawing in over 500 people and claiming the title of The Sydney Fringe’s best free event in 2010. The Pop Up Festival was a night of surprises, roving street performers, music and a giant treasure hunt.

The Artcore Guerrilla Art Fair on Thursday 15 September was a night market incorporating music, drinks and 30 independent local artists selling their work to the public. The Festival of Free Spaces insists on keeping events free for the public, as well as for the artists who participate. As such, the Artcore Guerrilla Art Fair was free for artists, enabling them to sell their work directly to the public and completely cutting out the role of the commercial gallery. The artists did not need to pay the large fees common when renting a market stall or a gallery space and they were able to keep all of the money made from the sale of their works. Local art galleries Hardware Gallery and I Heart Gallery volunteered to help source artists through their contacts, which resulted in a wide variety of local artists working across a range of different mediums.

Artcore – Guerilla Art Fair © Martin Andersen, 2011

Reclaim the Lanes on Saturday 24 September was an afternoon exploration of the forgotten lanes of Newtown. Meeting at Peace Park in Newtown, a convoy of wheelie-bin mobile sound systems, musicians, performers and anyone who wished to join in stopped in two laneways for an hour each, resulting in a unique party and celebration of the area and its community. Chris Lego claims that the event is about laying open the whole laneway and seeing what transpires – how visitors choose to engage with Reclaim the Lanes really determines its final from. A giant game of croquet and a performance from a four-piece string quartet occurred on the day, with visitors encouraged to bring anything that might add to the fun. Reclaim the Lanes made a real effort to be child friendly with hundreds of glow sticks, bubble machines and 2000 pieces of chalk present on the day. This completely changed the atmosphere of the laneway party, allowing everyone to become involved and encouraging children to be creative and spontaneous.

Newtown Lanes Reclaimed © Jennifer Dooley, 2011

The Sydney Fringe is Sydney’s alternative festival for the visual and performing arts, and this was its second year in its current form. Taking part in The Sydney Fringe has been beneficial for the Festival of Free Spaces, as it has given them the opportunity to apply for funding from Marrickville Council and to approach venues as an official event. It has resulted in receiving funding for an event that Lego and his crew would have paid for themselves, as they have done with similar events in the past. The Dendy Cinema in Newtown opened their car park for free to host the Artcore Guerrilla Art Fair, making an effort to clear out all cars. Chris Lego identified this as a special thing, as the space had never been used to host a creative event before. In addition to local government funding and local businesses offering spaces and access to power, an honest relationship was formed between the event and the local police to assist in its success. Many contributed their spare time to make it all happen purely for the love of it, resulting in an event that reflected community spirit and altruism and had no room for aggression or exclusivity.

Artist run initiatives are important for Sydney’s art and culture due to their willingness to take risks and experiment. They also have the ability to eliminate the sense of exclusivity that can often exist within Sydney’s art scene. Chris Lego has done exactly this with the Festival of Free Spaces, a unique event that makes the arts more accessible and gives local, independent artists the chance to show their work to a wider audience. He emphasises the fact that it is not about what he has done ­– it is about the network of people that have joined forces to make it happen. It is this collective nature that means anyone can do it. The Festival of Free Spaces provides a very suitable model for cultural events in public spaces and it is clear that temporary artist-run events have the potential to lead the way in Sydney’s cultural scene.

Photographer Jennifer Dooley All of Us Together, 2011 www.allofustogether.ca

Bibliography / Further reading

Artworker Issue 2, 2008, Art Workers, viewed 15/09/2011

<http://www.artworkers.org/pdf/Artworkerissue2.pdf>

Carroll Harris, L. 2011, Preview: Pop Up Festival, Newtown, Music Feeds, viewed 3/09/2011,

<http://musicfeeds.com.au/culture/preview-pop-up-festival-newtown/>

Chris Lego, Personal communication, Monday 19 September 2011

Murn, C. July 2008, Empty Spaces: Government regulation is killing Australian culture, IPA Review, viewed 5/09/2011

<http://www.ipa.org.au/publications/1368/empty-spaces-government-regulation-is-killing-australian-culture>

The Sydney Fringe, 2011, Marrickville, Sydney, viewed 1/09/2011, <www.thesydneyfringe.com.au>

We Are Here September 2011, Event booklet, National Association for the Visual Arts, viewed 6/09/2011, <http://www.visualarts.net.au/sites/default/files/wah_booklet.pdf>

Australia could benefit from some therapy

Wednesday, October 19th, 2011

Family © Lily Slade, 2008

By Anna Lumsden

‪ “Art therapy in Australia now, is only at the point New York was 20 years ago!”‪

‪For many years I have had particular interest in humanities use of symbolic communication through art. The field of art therapy uses art practices as a tool to understand internal confusions. The United States has well-established philosophies and practice, with superior training and many more opportunities for employment. Art Therapy evolved from the pursuits of psychologists Margaret Naumberg and Edith Kramer in the US. Naumberg “was forever pointing out that art therapy, with its use of symbolic language and imagery, was often a more effective road to the unconscious than the usual verbal approach of psychoanalysis and dynamic psychotherapy” (Frank, T. 1983.) Unfortunately Australia does not have adequate education and practices in the field.

‪I sat down with Leonie Reisberg, “probably Australia’s most qualified Art Therapist” (Reisberg, 2011. Personal communication) to discuss the field. Reisberg has with 25 years experience, practicing for a significant period in Brooklyn, New York before returning to Australia. Reisberg enlightened me to her philosophies and experiences in the different countries.

‪Reisberg completed a bachelor if Fine Arts in Photography from RMIT, Melbourne. Reisberg’s work is held in collection at the Art Gallery of South Australia, The Polaroid collection in Amsterdam, the Art Institute of Chicago and the Visual Arts Board. After success as a visual artist “working solidly in the industry producing works, creating shows,” the grind of the solo path “lead to an eventual desire to give back at 28 years old.”

‪Some 25 years ago, Reisberg “met Marja Boddeus teaching the only art therapy course in Australia… at COFA. I asked if I could sit in on the course and she said ‘Yes’ cause people let you do that sort of thing 25 years ago. (Laughs) Boddeus was in fact a school psychologist at Summer Hill Primary School. Boddeus and Reisberg ‘hit it off …and she said do you want to come along and be my assistant so then for a year we tried out all these different things, it was very experimental, but at the end of the year I realised I needed a proper education, so I thought, I have to go back to America… so I went to New York.”

‪Resiberg applied to the Pratt Institute and New York University. She was accepted at both but chose the Pratt Institute because it “gave the best feeling. The education was very focused. The people who were teaching had been working in the field for 30 – 40 years experience, so, I was being taught by really experienced people. I was lucky to have that type of education.”

‪“I just had such a nice feeling from the guy who ran it. He was in his 60’s and very warm and he basically said, ‘Yes, yes you can do what ever you want’, which are my favourite words. So I signed up.”

‪Reisberg mentioned that NYU “just didn’t feel right. NYU was less hands on, analytical and in a university, where as the Pratt was more hands on and involved and in and taught in an art school.”

‪According to Reisberg, Pratt Institute students were encouraged to pursue their own therapy. As a result Reisberg was in analysis 3 times a week for 4 years. This facilitated the opportunity for personal growth and educational development, which Leonie believes contributes to a therapist’s success.

‪Reisberg believes the most effective way of learning is through experiential process, “without experience its just in your head.” It’s not enforced.

‪We digressed about the therapy scene in New York, which leads me to wonder if the art therapy scene is so much more advanced there because New Yorkers honestly believe that everybody needs to be in therapy?!

‪‪The role of a therapist is not to tell you what to do, “that’s a bad therapist.” Instead the therapist is there “to help you come to your own realisations through your own process. My way is through using art.”

‪“If something is happening. If you don’t have a priest, a rabbi, a confidante, if that’s not what you have in your life to access, you can go and see someone professionally who can help you navigate that path.” Reisberg uses art, as pictures go beyond words and clients are able to use art to “totally pictorially say it how it is.”

Rainbows © Lily Slade, 2011

‪Art therapy is not about process or product, one or the other, independent of each other. Art therapy is not about producing a fine art product. An art therapist is not an art teacher. The therapist is not interested in improving a person’s art. The process of creation is what is important to art therapy.  The creative process “expressed how I felt about…”

‪During therapy sessions a client is asked to look at their creations. “They created it. I didn’t create it. They created it so they have to own it.” Through therapist guided analysis the client is able to communicate that “something getting in their way… what they can’t see immediately, what they don’t want to acknowledge.”

‪Reisberg works primarily with children, 95% of her clients are children. The other 5% are “your normal neurotics, women like us”. She acknowledges the particular benefit of art therapy with children as if “most children don’t want to talk about something they simply won’t, but art goes beyond that. It doesn’t lie. And it’s fun!”

‪As a successful therapist Reisberg recognises that in regard to well being the mind cannot be separated from the body. “As Freud said: if you don’t have a body, you’re a nobody.”‪

‪Reisberg provides an example of the intertwined nature of mind and body describing the challenges experienced by children on the ADHA and Autism spectrum. These children often require more than one modality of therapy, struggling with physical difficulties.

‪“If a kid can’t be understood how can they communicate? How can they be understood? How can they integrate?”

‪“If a kid slumps in a chair, with no physical integrity, a clumsy child, they won’t be thanked and their feelings of being an outsider will be enforced.”

‪Art therapy works on the inside while other therapies, like Occupational Therapy (OT) works on the outside, with body boundaries. Complimenting art therapy with OT will assist a child to integrate with society and importantly their peers.

‪Another group that has benefited from Reisberg’s qualification were children in hospital. For 15 years, in 2 different hospitals in NY, Leonie ran an art therapy program for the paediatric unit, “Programs for Bedside kids. Aids kids. Crack kids. Chronic illness, like Crones disease, asthma, diabetes, as well as the Acute kids who fell out of tress and broke their legs and were in traction for 6 weeks.”

‪Resiberg conducted group and bedside programs, wheeling her supplies around to conduct session providing some respite from their confinement. The usual activities included art making sessions and sand tray play. However, the capacity of each of the children was varied and therefore “to be a good art therapist one needs to be extremely flexible. For example, if the child were incapacitated” – their arms and legs bound or broken or riddled with iv’s – the plan for the session would have to be modified. Therefore the therapist would approach the session asking the child to ‘be the brains and I’ll draw. I’m going to ask you a lot of questions and you have to tell me exactly what you want you want me to do for you. The kids would respond with huge grins, they were so happy. They were given an opportunity to have some control of their world when they usually feel they have no control. The kids would ask me to draw their family or dog because they missed them.’

In response to the events of 9/11 in the US, art therapy programs were introduced to assist with rehabilitation. At the time of the attacks Reisberg was residing and practicing in Brooklyn NY. Resiberg and a friend of hers, who is a music therapist, ran a 6-week program on a completely voluntary basis, for the children of the fire fighters in the neighborhood. Some of the children had completely shut down, all were extremely emotionally distressed, however through the program the children were able to express artistically and musically their inner state. Importantly the group programs showed the children “they had each other and in a group they could share their grief and loss.”

‪With more than 10 years lecturing experience in NY – Pratt Institute, Long Island University and College of New Rochelle – and more recently at La Trobe in Melbourne Australia, in addition to decades of private practice, Reisberg is an ideal professional to provide advice for pursuing a career in the. If location is of little consequence Reisberg’s first recommendation is the Pratt. “The US has well established intern programs. Fabulous mentoring and supervisions to provide enriched, well rounded and guided education for practice.”

‪The professional horizon of a budding art therapist does not look good. Reisberg stresses there are simply no jobs in Australia and this is a big problem. Resiberg has observed that students sign up and graduate with “No full time employment opportunities. That’s a problem to go into a field where you come out, and even though you might have loved your education, there aren’t enough employment opportunities.”

‪In spite of doing a lot of student supervision she has only known 2 people to secure paid employment. Reisberg does admit that she is not completely patched into the art therapy scene in Australia. Perhaps it’s not all that bad…

‪Perhaps, but Reisberg believes in light of the current economic climate in the US, “no doubt jobs are being cut left right and centre there are still plenty more jobs in US than Australia.” However, for some reason Australian institutes churn out 10 – 15 graduates per year in spite of little to no prospect of employment.

‪“There is no vigorous momentum here in Australia. There’s not enough momentum, a lack of cohesion to provide a firm direction. There’s never been a core that’s been organised in of itself with a leader that’s recognised.”

‪If the luxury of studying abroad is not an option Leonie believes La Trobe University, Melbourne offers the best tertiary art therapy program in Australia.‪

‪After speaking with Reisberg the field of art therapy maintained its potential, but the state of art therapy in Australia is disheartening.  Art therapy in Australia is a long way behind the United States. Leonie believes that Australia “is only at the point NY was 20 years ago!” I wonder if Australia is only 20 years behind… Australia has a lot of catching up to do. The quality of available education is lagging and employment opportunities are nominal.

‪Ideally Australia will recognize the benefits of art therapy without adopting the New York philosophy that “everybody needs to be in therapy.”

Clay © Lily Slade, 2011

‪Art Therapy provides the opportunity to make sense of internal conflicts experienced by the creator. Through the process of creating and consequent therapist guided reflection, artistic creations can provide insight and clarity for the creator.

‪The benefits of art therapy, in conjunction with Australian publications that detail the benefits of creativity on overall well-being, in addition to creativity stimulating intellectual development, makes an undeniable argument for art therapy.

‪There are opportunities to incorporated art therapy into public programs in hospitals, clinics, community centres, schools and drug and alcohol facilities to name a few. Each and every one of these demographics has the potential to gain a lot from art therapy programs. However, until educational facilities and employment opportunities are at a more than satisfactory standard in Australia, the true benefit of art therapy may be missed down under.

‪My parting words to Reisberg remain optimistic “…Perhaps in 20 years time, when you’re relying on your motorised Zimmer frame with Pegasus deign – I will be able to call you the matriarch, the grandmother, of Australian art therapy.”

Sao Paulo Museum of Art cries for help

Wednesday, October 19th, 2011

Masp2 © Eric Matsumoto Okawa, 2010

By Elka Okawa

The Sao Paulo Museum of Art Assis Chateubriant (MASP) is the most important museum of Western art not only in Brazil but also in Latin America. The museum’s permanent exhibition has more than 8,000 artworks with innumerous works by some of the best known artists in the European canon – mostly Italian and French including Rafael, Mantegna, Botticelli, Delacroix, Renoir, Monet, Cezanne, Picasso, Modigliani, Toulouse-Lautrec, Van Gogh, Matisse, Chagall, Diego Rivera, Cândido Portinari, Di Cavalcanti, Anita Malfatti and Almeida Junior. It is possible to also appreciate photographs, drawings and sculptures by Degas, Rodin, Ernesto di Fior, Victor Brecheret. MASP is a member of the Musée D’Orsay’s 19th-century club and in 1982 it was named a heritage site by the Historical Asset Defence Council of the state. This important museum was the first Brazilian museum to be recognised for the great historical importance of its collection. MASP’s founder Pietro Maria Bardi managed it for many years, and only left the management post in 1996, three years before his death.

In addition to being an important tourist destination, for both national and international visitors, MASP is also a cultural centre offering different activities. These include the art school, the atelier, dance and music festivals, theatres, debates, lectures and courses for art teachers. It is the most visited museum in Sao Paulo with an average of 50,000 visitors per month (Folha de Sao Paulo, April 5, 2009).

However, in the last decade, the museum has faced some serious management problems that are directly affecting its financial situation. In 2004, a major Sao Paulo newspaper, Folha de Sao Paulo, released the first article to the wider public calling attention to the museum’s situation.

Although MASP assets are valuated in US$1 billion, just the labour debt is more than US$2 million (…) MASP is facing a serious financial crisis.

How can an important museum like MASP be facing financial problems? Is nobody looking after the museum’s interest? It is not a small art institution where people can pretend as though nothing is happening. It is the biggest museum in Latin America! There are many successful museums all over the world and those who are managing them have no secrets. A comparison of MASP with other museums brings to light the value of this important Brazilian institution.

The Sao Paulo Museum of Art Assis Chateubriant

Sao Paulo is the fourth biggest city in the world and the largest in South Hemisphere with 1,530 km² and more than 11 million people (CENSUS, 2010). As in all big cities, the metropolitan area also includes another 39 cities and more than 20 million people.

At the beginning of the 20th Century Sao Paulo experienced a massive population growth due to immigration, the development of industry and the improvement of the coffee economy. The need for leisure and free spaces immediately increased. As a result, parks, picnic areas, leisure societies, cinemas and theatres emerged (PIRES, 2001). The city has created various cultural spaces including the Sao Paulo Museum of Art Assis Chateubriand (MASP), the Sao Paulo Town Hall, the Museum of the Portuguese Language, the State Art Gallery, the Brazilian Art Museum, the Afro-Brazilian Museum, the Cultural Centre and the Modern Art Museum. In 1922, Sao Paulo hosted Modern Art Week, which featured important local artists such as Anita Malfatti, Mario de Andrade, Oswald de Andrade. At that time, it was not well understood by the population, but it was this event that afterwards raised cultural consciousness in the country and ultimately led to the creation of MASP. 18 years later, in 1940, journalist Assis Chateaubriand collaborated with art critic Pietro Maria Bardi to create an art museum with a brief of being revolutionary. The intention was to create not only a space to appreciate art, but also a centre to disseminate culture and art by teaching and by offering courses to the audience. Chateaubriand’s intention was to create “a house of painting and sculpture to constitute the interest of our (Brazilian) people in arts” (BARDI, 1992). MASP was founded in this context, and opened on October 2nd 1947.

In 1983 a convention called First City and Culture was hosted in Sao Paulo to discuss the future of cultural spaces, as well as their fundraising issues. At that time MASP did not attend the forum for it was self-funded. The quality of its permanent collection meant that works rented to other countries, including Japan, were enough to maintain the institution. Unfortunately, the museum situation has since changed.

In 1995, the architect Julio Neves was elected the new president of MASP. His controversial management style included a US$12 million reform of the building from March 1996 to September 2001.  In the first years of his management, he organised big exhibitions that attracted hundreds of thousands of visitors and inserted Brazil in the mega-exhibition circuit. The museum exhibited The Italian Art in Brazilian Collection in 1996, Monet and Michelangelo in Italian Art History in 1997 and Egypt – Gods’ Land in 2001, which featured more than 120 pieces from Louvre’s collection. This was the turning point.

The management of the museum did not realise that they were constructing a model that tended to concentrate on a visiting public and consequently began to only receive sponsorship for these blockbuster events. With no funds to compete with other institutions, there was a drop in the number of visitors. In 2004, Retrato de Camões, a painting from Portuguese artist José de Guimarães, was deaccessioned to pay a debt of US$1.8 millions. In 2006 the museum had its electricity cut due to another US$2 million debt — this time with the state electricity company. The museum crisis was growing and becoming a big problem with a difficult solution. In 2007, their debt was estimated to be US$6 million.

Museum Management

As with any private company, it is essential for museums to define strategies and products to be offered to customers. For Silberberg (1994), product quality perception, originality, customer service, sustainability, product perception, facilities, community engagement and support and management compromise are key factors to attracting visitors to museums or cultural attractions.

Analysing from Silberberg’s perspective, MASP situation is not bad. Despite the crisis and the fact that there are no new acquisitions, MASP holds Latin America’s biggest collection. The diversity of the works talk for themselves in terms of originality. Service to the client and the sustainability of the institution are points that can always be improved. Despite the problems that the museum is facing, the perception of the museum’s artworks has not changed. The Museum’s building was designed by Lina Bo Bardi, an Italian modernist architect. It is located in one of the city’s most important financial avenues and it is the only construction in the world where the main body rests in four lateral pillars over a 74 meters freestanding space. The MASP problem is clearly related to the quality of its management.

Some Solutions for MASP

The most important museum in Latin America is facing some management shortcoming and solutions will be proposed here.

Firstly, MASP should hire a professional manager.

Good management is about vision. However, museum management is unique.  According to Timothy Ambrose, “museums are for people” (1993).  Besides possessing the usual qualities of a good manager, a museum manager should always keep that point in mind. When Elizabeth Ann Macgregor took up the Directorship of the Sydney’s Museum of Contemporary Art (MCA) in 1999, she knew she had to take the museum’s work out to new audiences. She also knew that the MCA at that point was the only museum in Australia dedicated to contemporary art, so she used this knowledge to create a national profile for the space. Visitor attendance at the MCA increased to over 578,900 in 2010 and came out of a difficult financial position.

Tate Gallery in London, the Metropolitan Museum of Art (MET) in New York and the Guggenheim are managed by specialists in the field, executives and professional cultural fundraisers. Besides that, those institutions publish a public balance sheet annually.

Secondly, the marketing and advertising strategy should improve.

The museum should have its own brand product. MASP’s souvenir shop only sells products with the exhibition content as notebooks, pencils and calendars. No products with the museum brand are sold. The Modern Museum of Art (MAM) has many MAM stores located in the biggest Shopping Malls of the city, selling designer and new artist works like necklaces, scarves and earrings.

Tourism has an important economic role in Sao Paulo.  In 2009, 11.3 million people visited Sao Paulo, a 37.8% increase compared to 2004. Domestic tourists stay 3.3 days on average in the city and spend US$1,700 during that period. International tourists stay longer, 5.3 days and spend an average of US$2,400 in the same period. MASP is a major tourist point for both local and international visitors that stay in the city. Unfortunately, there are no incentive policies such as flyers or booklets in Portuguese, English or in any other language.

The museum could also think about making a cultural partnership or connections with other national or international institutions to promote art.

Thirdly, the museum should create groups to maintain the institution.

The Modern Museum of Art (MAM) has 1,000 members. The contribution varies from US$75 to US$5,000 per year and offers discounts in shops, restaurants and courses offered by the museum. In France there is a National Museum Group that manages funds for the acquisition and conservation of art collections at 34 museums and two exposition centres. This takes place under the supervision of the France Ministry of Culture. The tickets for the museums and the commercialisation of their brands guarantee the financial health of all institutions. In the United States, where the Government does not play such an important role in funding, the museums are maintained by the population. The MET in New York has more than 120,000 members that contribute from US$45 to US$20,000 per year. One successful case is Andrew Mellon from a banker’s family. He donated 900 artworks to create the National Gallery in the 1930s and also started a group with some of his wealthy friends to help the gallery. Interestingly, another group was created from this first one — their wives, otherwise known as bored ‘ladies who lunch’, started volunteering as museum guides. The Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) and the MET in New York have some of the oldest guide programs. The Art Gallery of New South Wales (AGNSW) in Sydney started theirs in 1972. In addition to guiding the public through the artworks, these ladies or their families may also become benefactors. Mollie Gowing, originally a guide, recently left a large bequest to AGNSW of almost 400 paintings, sculptures, photographs, ceramics and fibre works.

And lastly, MASP should be thought as a cultural space.

When it was founded, Chateaubriand’s ideal was to create an integrated art space. Plenty of people visited MASP because of the courses of art history, photography, music and cinema. In the latest years those activities were almost abandoned. The museum has a great space and is located in the heart of Sao Paulo’s commercial area and is currently not being cleverly used.

Again, none of the solutions proposed above are new. Being able to propose some viable solutions just emphasises that hiring the right professionals to manage the museum would improve this never ending nightmare. Despite all problems the museum is facing, in 2011, Indian Ambassador Fausto Godoy donated Asian art and crafts to MASP, placing the museum under the same category as the MET in New York. This might be the light in the end of the tunnel, or it might be an alert saying that such an important museum should not be facing such a sad situation.

References

Ambrose, Timothy, Museum basics, (Taylor & Francis, 1993)

Art Gallery of New South Wales

Bardi, Pietro Maria, A História do MASP (Quadrante, 1992)

Bergamo, Marlene and Daniel Bergamasco, ‘Teto do MASP tem placas de alumínio quebradas, e museu culpa pássaros’, Folha de São Paulo, 19 June 2007

Boyayan, Miguel, ‘MASP pede socorro’, Veja São Paulo, 28 June 2004

Canal Contemporâneo, ‘MASP pede socorro!’

CENSO 2010

Dumazeidier, Jofre, ‘Lazer e Cultura Popular’ (1979) FFLCH/ USP

Lamarca, ‘O Museu Paulista como Atrativo Turístico da cidade de Sao Paulo’ (2001) ECA/ USP

The Metropolitan Museum of Art

Museu de Arte Moderna de São Paulo MAM

The Museum of Contemporary Art, Sydney

The Museum of Modern Art, New York

Pires, Mário J, Lazer e Turismo Cultural (Manole, 2nd ed, 2002)

São Paulo Turismo

Silberberg, Ted, ‘Cultural Tourism and Business Opportunities for Museums and Heritage Sites’ (1994) University of Victoria

TASSINARI, Alberto, Pequeno Guia Berlendis de Hitória da Arte – do Renascimento ao Impressionismo Através das Obras do MASP (Berlendis & Vertecchia, 1995)

Addressing the problem of an empty life in a developed consumer economy

Wednesday, October 19th, 2011

By Margarett Cortez

With interviews of Fran Barrett and Tom Smith of Serial Space, and Valentina Schulte of International Noise.

If we were to name only one activity which a huge percentage of modern society regularly engages in, it would probably be nothing. ‘What are you doing?’ Nothing. ‘What did you do last night?’ Nothing, really. ‘What are you going to do this weekend?’ Let me see – nothing.

A fast paced life involving a blur of work during the day and culminating in front of the television or computer at night – with the option of doing nothing while drinking beer at a pub – is an all too familiar scenario. However, there is much to discover in Sydney: from after hours programs hosted by museums such as the Art Gallery of New South Wales and the Australian Museum, to free movie nights at various cultural institutions, to live music gigs in little bars – there is something out there for everybody. Those who seek shall certainly be rewarded and at times all you have to do is open your ears and listen to what people are talking about.

Serial Space

Word of mouth has recently been carrying news of delightful exhibits and one of a kind events in independent spaces often managed by artist-run initiatives. One such ARI is Serial Space in Chippendale which has been steadily building a community since 2009, recently mostly through word of mouth. One morning over coffee in Redfern, I sat together with two of Serial’s directors Fran Barrett and Tom Smith to talk about this unique ARI.

Serial Space is an artist-run space, just like its name suggests, focused on the live forms. Its six directors range from varying backgrounds and contribute to the ARI’s direction, ‘we bring in to the space what we actually want to bring in to the space,’ shares Fran. ‘We try and implement what we like in the space or what we think the community needs’.

More than just a gallery, Serial plays host to a variety of performances, talks and exhibits with a view towards delivering unique experiences to visitors. They cater to a diverse range of people who come together in a cross over of different communities. Serial runs a debate program and has hosted them on various topics such as ‘experimental music is boring’, or in regards to the ‘pros and cons of polyamory.’ They have also had an audio-visual performance installation where visitors can participate; a ‘robot wars’ tournament, regular suitcase markets and spontaneous music and experimental film gigs among many others – all of which have seen various communities gather, from polyamorous people to robot geeks. ‘It’s kind of hard sometimes because we can be quite niche but with all the diversity we have with programs that cater to a lot of different people – you know, a lot of communities,’ Fran says about their diverse curatorial offering. They don’t specifically cater to an arts crowd either; their goal is to bring together a community of people with similar interests, whether it be a specific hobby or chasing after new experiences in general.

The Great Donkey Debate at Serial Space, Lucy Parakhina, 2010 © Serial Space, 2010. Courtesy of Serial Space

In attending one of their events, visitors should leave their inhibitions at the gate and be prepared to participate, interact and exercise their curiosity. ‘It might be a bit intimidating at first’, warns Tom about entering Serial Space for the first time – what with its secluded location in a residential area, ‘But we try to make sure that the atmosphere is friendly.’ Fran adds, ‘People can just walk up to it. And once you keep going to the space… you get used to it’.

Offering beyond what most static exhibitions deliver, Serial and its directors and resident artists are focused on process rather than the resulting object or artwork. Everybody is encouraged to ask the artists questions and experience the art works and installations using their sense of touch, hearing, and sight.  With its unconventional and dynamic set-up, the interaction between the artist and the audience becomes part of what the artwork is and will be.

At its heart as an artist-run initiative, Serial Space’s main aim is to extend the benefits of a free space, audience and support network for experimental artists to hone their art. Fran also describes their focus on process – as well as conversation with an audience – as a necessity for artists to develop their (art) practice. With the dynamic nature and continuous development characteristic of experimental work, it is certainly important to ‘test it out.’  Serial provides the space so that artists in residency can engage in that process; while getting them to communicate with an audience in a dynamic set up gives them the opportunity to introduce their practice and gather input that will shape their work.

Unlike the stereotypical white cube, Serial Space’s white walls alternatively foster an atmosphere which makes open interaction between artist, object, and audience possible. Events and exhibits held at Serial are surely out of the mainstream and span a variety of fields of interests. However, it is mainly the spirit of and idea behind the space which enables it to deliver unique and authentic experiences. Tom also describes it as a place where life and art converge, where people come together and do what they like to do in their free time. And rightly so, it’s in the resulting shared experience where we find more meaning in what we do.

Serial Space is located in 33 Wellington Street, Chippendale. They are open depending on scheduled exhibits and events. Visit their website at www.serialspace.org or add them on Facebook to keep track of events they have lined up.

International Noise

Keep an eye out while walking around the city, you never know what you might see while walking under a bridge; those strategically pasted up sheets of A3 paper that strangely feels like an exhibit might actually be an exhibit. International Noise is a guerilla artist-run initiative that has been bringing art to the streets since 2006. ‘We would consider ourselves to be guerilla artists but (we’re) not just about putting the art out there, it’s more about utilising space in different ways and making art available to everybody in the street,’ explains photographer and International Noise co-founder Valentina Schulte.

Uncontainble exhibit by International Noise at University of Sydney © Valentina Schulte, 2011

While a lot of established galleries get funding for space and give a call out for residents, International Noise does not have a gallery space and does not hold a residency program. ‘For us it’s more convenient that we don’t have a space because the three main contributors, including myself, all have day jobs.’ Their guerilla approach to art exhibits takes out the responsibility of having to constantly manage a physical space, while the lack of a residency program makes involvement more fluid and accessible. True to what their name suggests, artist involvement also goes beyond Australia, ‘Sometimes we’d put up a call for entries and for our last exhibition we had about 35 people submit work from around the world so that’s good, more people are now hearing about it.’

International Noise’s first exhibit was called Copy Cats, wherein works by home-grown and international artists alike were printed on A3 paper and bill posted in an area in Paddington. It was a one night only show which saw a second follow up, Copy Cats 2. Their biggest project to date was 9 x 5” a roving gallery in the back of a truck featuring artworks which measure exactly 9 inches by 5 inches – taking inspiration from traditional cigar boxes, and quoting the famous Australian Impressionist artists of 1889. Valentina explains that with this truck show, ‘We wanted to challenge the white cube – well at that time since we were all at the end of our university years it was hard to get into a gallery space so we thought well we’ll just take one with us. That’s a white cube but that white cube moves.’ The truck was parked in three different locations for an hour or two: at the Art Gallery of New South Wales, in front of the Australian Centre for Photography and at Dank Street Depot. Reflecting on the exhibit, Valentina concludes that it was well received and people were really open; the only sign of apprehension from the audience was from the first few people to approach the truck and go in.

Their exhibits, which highlight the way the installation is carried out as much as the content, combine both a theoretical concept and practical street art approach. For example, in looking at photos of their first exhibit Copy Cats, one might as well be looking at a regular gallery opening with a similar crowd gazing at art works on a wall – except visitors were under a bridge in Paddington looking at paste ups on a concrete wall. This accessible and comfortable set up creates a more relaxed atmosphere while trying to challenge the notion of art always being tied to galleries. “From a viewer’s point of view galleries can be a little intimidating to walk into on your own. Sometimes a little bit daunting if you’re not used to it.”

While pre-conceived notions attached to the idea of being ‘guerilla’ might generally by negative, International Noise is more innovative rather than subversive in their challenge of the white cube. Rationale behind their exhibits are worded in eloquent briefs that almost read like discourse tidbits that are easy to understand and make perfect sense. Whereas Serial Space challenges the static notion of the white cube by utilising that very space as a field for ideas exchange and the development of processes in art practice, International Noise challenges it by taking art works out of the white cube context. In the end, the exhibits are successful because the society is, to a degree, educated or informed about what art is – therefore allowing them to see these objects, or performances, as works of art despite having been taken out of the white cube. Consequently, the nature of this object in relation to its surrounding – is it displaced or does it belong there? – prods viewers into rethinking space.

International Noise recently concluded an installation this September at the University of Sydney’s Verge Festival, Uncontainable, which showcased shipping containers filled on the outside with their signature paste-up style exhibit and juxtaposed with a more formally presented exhibit inside the containers.