Archive for the ‘Exhibition Reviews’ Category

We’ve lost our good old mama

Monday, October 17th, 2011

The Author

By David Lyndon

‘It’s just like Howlin’ Wolf used to say,’ says Brad, a bartender and close friend who I have been calling ‘Hans’ for the entire morning. ‘You got them “ol’ Weimar Blues”.’

I chewed over this possibly unintentional non sequitur for a few moments before reassuring Hans that he was indeed correct and that I should very much like to have another Martini.

Not only was the attribution a shade off the mark, but Hans had failed to perceive my mood entirely. I wasn’t blue, I felt fantastic.

The Sunday sun was at its peak and I was already several cocktails into an endless Berlin night. I had been attempting for the last two, maybe three hours, to fortify myself with some kind of mad fervour to better appreciate Berlin Sydney – a series of arts events held in conjunction with AGNSW’s exhibition of German modern art, The Mad Square.

My plan; to get inside the myth of the ‘golden years’ of the Weimar Republic – Germany’s fleeting reprieve in the wake of a horrific and crippling war, a violent revolution and financial ruin. The unending party before the dark clouds of Nazi horror closed in.

It’s a time that has been romanticised as a ‘modern’ renaissance. During this short period in the late 1920s and early 1930s, Germany was the world’s centre for cutting-edge thought. Heisenberg, Adorno, Born, Heidigger, Horkheimer, Benjamin, Godel and dozens of other figures from this period who are significant enough to be known instantly by their surname, developed the foundations of 20th century physics, philosophy and mathematics. Cultural output during this time is said to have rivalled any other period in human history, with the creative arts being produced in Germany being more advanced, varied and daring than anywhere else in the world.

It was also presumably a lot of fun.

In Berlin, the epicentre of this intellectual and artistic maelstrom, night-time revellers drifted from club to club, places like El Dorado and Kakadu, all lit up in flashing electric light, rubbing shoulders with intellectuals and outcasts, criminals and bohemians. The cocaine-laced ‘Berlin wind’ blew them along for days on end and they never got tired.

The American crazes for cocktails (borne out of a need to mask the flavour of cheap bootleg liquor) and jazz had taken root in Berlin and were the daily bread for these 24-hour party people.

So that is why I am drinking martinis at midday.

It’s all well and good to stand back and admire the culture of the period at a distance but I’m obsessed with trying to see these things through the same eyes. These works were created by artists who had seen the collapse of society as a very real possibility a few short years before, for an audience that did not mind that tomorrow may never come. What insights can be discovered by replicating that air of utter abandon?

I’ve organised for myself and some compatriots to catch a performance of The Threepenny Opera in Walsh Bay then head to the gallery to see Mad Square, prefacing, punctuating and concluding these events with stops Hans’ bar within a bookshop – ‘Moonshine Slim’s at Ampersand’ on Crown St – my El Dorado-lite for the day.

Given that we could not locate ‘sultry Argentinian waitresses’ to serve us ‘petals from white roses that had been soaked in chloroform and ether’ (apparently, the designer drugs of the day), primal cocktails interspersed with fits of cheap champagne would suffice to haul the burden of my sanity into new and greater realms. The names passed by like a parade of dear friends – Manhattan, Martini, French 75 (named after a WW1 cannon), Mint Julep – this cavalcade dancing to the beat of the Wientraub Syncopators, Kurt Weill, Billy Bartholemew and Teddy Kline’s Jazz sinfonie.

To the great relief of those eating lunch or quietly browsing for books, my awkward attempts to perform the Charleston were soon interrupted by the urgent need to make our way to the matinee.

Rolling onto the street, the beastly sun judging us harshly, I feel as if I have become my own wax double. An escapee from Madame Tussaud’s, facial features turning to liquid, I spill into the back seat of a taxi.

We arrive at the theatre and get through the front door, with only the merest hint of total, utter confusion.

I hear that lonesome curtain-call bell. He sounds too blue to fly.

In my seat now and on stage there is a noose overshadowing what appears to be a boxing ring. It seems we are in for quite a cheery ride.

Brecht & Weill’s ‘ballad opera’ has been restaged by the Sydney Theatre Company, with lip service paid to transferring the action to present-day Sydney. It’s an odd choice. Mac the Knife stalks the mean streets of Randwick. I mean, sure, why not?

While, on the whole, the music, singing, acting and staging are unimpeachable, I spend much of the time pondering the implications and uncanny parallels of a Weimar-period play originally set in Victorian London refigured for noughties Sydney.

On stage; gangsters, beggars, whores, corrupt cops and a smattering of unwitting rubes, all faces painted in pallid, dour countenances. In the crowd; much the same but more polite, well dressed, tanned and wealthy. I imagine we’re all actors in the same in same schema, filling in time between impending crises. Credit crunch, colonial war, property-bubble apocalypse, murder, fire, bombings and peak oil –hubris and decadence punctuated by the taut crack of a hangman’s rope.

My head is swimming in Weill’s music; it’s the din and clatter of a metropolis keeling over sick in the gutter.

The opera frequently returns to grim themes; at one point the gangsters foreplay the Valentine’s Day Massacre, their backs against a wall, the lights making naked their shock and surprise. The absurd hilarity of a summary execution is on everyone’s mind.

Alongside the changes to setting are alterations to the lyrics of the songs. While only a very slight modification, changing the refrain from ‘What Keeps Mankind Alive’ to ‘What keeps a man alive’ is tantamount to fundamentally changing the meaning of song. Instead of a universal appeal to the masses it comes off more as a tabloid lambasting of Macheath. Less a discourse on the base nature of humanity and more a pageant of the ‘Knife’s bestial acts. I feel that it’s against the spirit of the play to put Mac on a pedestal like that, he’s supposed to be rescued from the gallows after all…

By the time we hear Polly Peachum sing about the ship in the harbour (The Pirate Song) I feel as though I am taking on water. The two dozen staging pretences (or perhaps, an equal number of French 75’s) are causing me to list heavily to one side. But like that it’s suddenly all over. The hangman will have to wait for another day and this treachery can only take us so far.

Another taxi and we’re waiting in line at the gallery to buy tickets for Mad Square.

The first room of the exhibition utilises the space most successfully. It’s closed in and confined, with the walls at odd angles, reminiscent of being lost in some serpentine Berlin back alley. Unevenly lit and combined with the darkly painted walls gives the impression of street lamps at midnight. Faces look alternatively like that of a back-alley thug or a dear friend – depending on where they stand.

In this room is Ludwig Meidner’s Apocalyptic Landscape, a precognitive ruined landscape rendered with hallucinatory intensity in 1912. The painting sets the scene for what, in an exhibition documenting a ‘tumultuous period’ in history, is arguably the calamitous. The First World War.

The second room illustrates the war through works by Beckmann, Dix, Grosz and Kollwitz. They are primarily concerned with its aftermath and detritus, its effects on the soldiers and the society they left behind. The thought that consumes me at this point is one of dehumanisation. I am not proud to say it but looking at the wounded, gas-masked or alien faces of the characters in Dix’s War series and at the murderous and Grosz’ deviant soldiers-on-leave, my throat is almost bursting with a knotty stream of revulsion. This is powerful, sickening stuff.

Considering one of Dix’s wounded soldiers, I am reminded of a song we had listened to at the bar a few hours earlier, Brecht’s Die Legende vom toten Soldaten (Ballad of the Dead Soldier). The lyrics recount the story of a soldier’s body being exhumed from a Verdun battlefield, passed fit for service, given a new uniform and recycled into combat. It’s a poetic idea, but to someone living in a society with thousands of people so grievously injured yet alive, it would be an everyday reality.

There is a very human counterpoint to Dix and Grosz’ meditations on dehumanisation in the form of Kathe Kollwitz’ wood block prints. It is as though they reflect the loss and anguish of so many during the war as an aching, dead-wooden grief.

Still reeling from the war, I find myself before an installation of works from the Berlin Dada scene. Abstract epileptic seizures of the mind. Random flashes of forgotten memories. Pastiche, cut up, remix culture presaged in the rage against the corrupt self-destruction of humanity and culture. Thinking of Dix’s re-sewn faces, a shrapnel ball through the face of God’s image, hastily patched up. One only needs to look at those poor Frankensteins to realise that nothing is sacred.

Bauhaus. Clean exposed living. Nowhere for the nightmares to hide.

Representing the rebirth of German industry in the post war period is a series of pieces, my favourite being Carl Grossberg’s White Tubes. It is a beautiful painting of an impressive machine with an array of chrome and pearl pipes. Its function is unknowable. I suggest that it, like Wim Delvoye’s Cloaca, is a machine for the manufacture of shit.

Another room and I can’t escape the feeling that all the portraits are glaring at me with the same eyes — that mad Weimar stare. As such I am immediately drawn to Karl Hubbuch’s Twice Hilde. Neither Hilde is looking at me. To be precise one is looking at the floor and the other in strict profile is looking perpendicularly away. In a strange way these isolated poses betray an intimacy the other portraits do not.

Depraved sex addicts, whores, lustmord. Everything is married to its dark twin; sex and murder, pleasure and pain. This is the kind of sinister madness that is vapourised with the dawn of the sun.

Somehow I have arrived in the final room of the exhibition and already I can sense the weight of a hammer suspended above me by a rapidly fraying rope. Entarte Kunst, a dove on a bayonet, Goering with a meat cleaver, a German family sits down for a pleasant meal of bomb parts.

I know the exhibition has been organised chronologically but I feel as if I missed the evanescent golden moment that I was expecting. There were glimpses of it surely, but I was still dragging the weight of the first war as even now I’m looking down the barrel of another.

I’m obviously not the only one who has a sense of impending doom. The characters in Felix Nussbaum’s Mad Square seem in an impossible rush to cash in before Berlin is reduced to an apocalyptic landscape.

There are some trite remarks about the ignominy of wading through the gift shop after dealing with all that heavy shit, but I cannot really be bothered to make them now. Instead we retreat back to the El Dorado to bunker down for coming storm. For if we don’t find the next whisky bar I tell you we must die…

Beyond the storage space: White Rabbit’s Beyond the Frame

Monday, October 17th, 2011

By Megan Hillyer

There has been no development in Australia’s art scene more exciting, or eagerly anticipated, than the recent emergence of privately funded, public art museums. In acts of philanthropy long overdue in Australia, a small group of private collectors have begun opening high-profile public spaces to display their very personal, much-loved art collections. Extravagant in nature and completely removed from the monetary limitations facing many of our state and public institutions, these spaces are continuing to astound gallery-goers with their novel approaches to thinking about and exhibiting art.

Sydney’s own White Rabbit Gallery, founded by Judith and Kerr Neilson, is no exception. Created out of Judith Nielson’s desire to share her 450+ collection of post-2000 contemporary Chinese art with all, the White Rabbit Gallery has quickly become one of Sydney’s most popular and lively art venues, celebrated for exhibitions that provide incredible insight into a very specific, relatively new area of contemporary art. In late August, they returned with another rehang, this time attempting to question and breakdown any sense of limits and boundaries in art.

Beyond the Frame, the fifth exhibition since opening in 2009, presents another diverse selection of thought-provoking, cutting-edge works drawn from the Neilson’s private collection. The exhibition revolves around a broad theme of transgression and transcendence — the word ‘frame’ having multiple connotations. It is intended literally, alluding to the transgression and transcendence of visual and artistic norms through choice of media and practice. It also refers to exploring and challenging conceptual frameworks and parameters of all kinds — social values, concepts of normality, the role and purpose of art, ideologies pertaining to Chinese culture, even the distinction between nature and man-made.

When it comes to contemporary Chinese art, a new generation of artists are indeed exploring and enjoying newfound artistic limitlessness. It was only thirty-five years ago that Mao Zedong’s death ended the Cultural Revolution. In the time since then, the cultural and artistic changes in China have been as dramatic as they have been rapid. Bouncing back in spectacular style from the global isolation and creative stagnation experienced under Mao, practicing artists concerned themselves with trying to establish new artistic paradigms that would restore a weakened nation and connect it to the West. Exposed to artistic and aesthetic styles occurring globally and fuelled with incredible cynicism over China’s political state, Chinese artists quickly began to test the boundaries of what was acceptable, both aesthetically and politically, in subtly subversive and disruptive ways.

Not much has changed when we consider the work of contemporary Chinese artists practicing today. As China continues to evolve as a commercial superpower, hurtling forward at a rate unparalleled by any other nation in the world, contemporary Chinese artists continue to do the same. In the process, they have captivated the international art world with daring works of art that respond to, and challenge, the rapid political and socioeconomic changes that have left the nation in a state of constant flux. The result? Visually innovative art that is more ambitious, subversive and thematically complex than anything else to emerge internationally in the last two decades.

It comes as no surprise then that an exhibition of Chinese contemporary art is held together by an overarching theme of transcendence of boundaries, or in this case, ‘frames and frameworks of all kinds’. Such ideas have become so synonymous with the vary nature of contemporary Chinese art that it is almost predictable.

Among the works exhibited, a standout piece thematically is Song Jianshu’s In the end, a mesmerising sculpture exhibited on the ground floor. In this work, Jianshu has subtly altered a large, uprooted tree by sanding and polishing the top of the trunk into a sharp point. In making slight interventions to its structure, Jianshu has removed the tree to a place where it is no longer identifiably part of or belonging to nature, yet neither a completely finished man-made work of art. This juxtaposition between untouched nature and human intervention is a conscious attempt to blur the boundary between nature and the built environment.

Works of art like In the end however, which have been created with the idea of blurring boundaries in mind, seem to be few and far between in this exhibition. With no real introduction to the theme aside from a brief statement that describes the works on display as thrilling demonstrations of how much more art can be than pretty pictures, Beyond the Frame as a concept is overly broad, non-specific, and above all, blatantly obvious. While the lack of definition around the idea of breaking down limits in art can be taken as a strategic move to demonstrate just how boundless art truly is, its complete lack of specificity makes it a fairly weak connecting theme to bring together nearly forty works of art which are all powerful and thematically complex in their own right.

Yet to base the value of Beyond the Frame solely on how well the works communicate the overall theme is to disregard the fact that first and foremost, this is an exhibition based on the display of works from a private collection.

At the very least, Beyond the Frame primarily revolves around the philosophy that drives White Rabbit Gallery as private art in a public art space. While the gallery was created based on Judith Neilson’s belief that art should be communally experienced and enjoyed, not bought and placed in storage, White Rabbit is fairly specific in its approach. Exclusively collecting contemporary Chinese art produced after 2000, the space operates on the idea of documenting and reflecting a new stage in contemporary Chinese art. Above all, the Neilsons want to change the way people think about this art. By continuing to provide visibility for lesser-known contemporary Chinese artists, White Rabbit displays its strength as a space committed to expanding perceptions of China’s art scene. Indeed, it is the impressive and unusual works of art selected for exhibition that has made White Rabbit such a popular venue, more so than any overruling theme put in place to make sense of them as a collective whole.

Beyond the Frame is no exception, an exhibition that presents another wide array of engaging works from both established and unknown contemporary Chinese artists, each reflecting just how dynamic and expansive the current practice of contemporary Chinese art actually is.

Typical of the awe-inspiring works often displayed at White Rabbit Gallery is the Madeln Company’s Calm, a hallucinatory installation piece composed of a waterbed, carpet and bricks. Originally exhibited as the work of an unknown Middle Eastern artist in an exhibition produced by the Madeln Company, Calm inspires contemplation of how prejudice is often manifested in the ways we think about the unrest in the Middle East. From afar, the work is deceivingly plain, nothing more than a large pile of dirt and rubble on the gallery floor. On closer inspection the work is visually astounding. The dirt is alive, appearing to breathe as the waterbed moves in waves beneath the rubble.

In the same vain is Peng Hungchih’s Farfur the Martyr, a politically charged water installation that explores the way cultural icons can become a tool for xenophobic sentiments. Visually spectacular, yet fairly unnerving in content, Hungchih has strangely placed a composite figure of Jesus Christ and Farfur — a famous Palestinian children’s TV show host who spread the word of jihad and was assassinated on live television by an Israeli — on top of the Star of David. Gushing water from various wounds and completely overwhelming in size, this work is a dark and absurd reflection on the many ways images and icons can have their meanings completely inverted in potentially destructive and subversive ways.

Farfur the Martyr © Peng Hungchih, 2009. All images courtesy of the artists and White Rabbit Gallery.

Farfur the Martyr is not the only work exhibited in Beyond the Frame truly unsettling in its questioning of sensitive and somber issues. In contrast to the flashy, technically impressive works displayed in previous exhibitions, the Neilson’s have chosen for Beyond the Frame a selection of works much more disturbing and serious in subject matter. Critical and reflective in nature, these works delve deep into uncomfortable truths and harrowing issues of both personal and communal importance. Illustrative of this is Cang Xin’s Sharmanism Series: Variation, exhibited on the second floor. Xin’s work presents pure carnage and butchery at its best. Demonstrating a cycle of sacrifice and subsequent regeneration, his drawings of life-sized dismembered male bodies with fresh wounds dripping blood, hooked by the ankle to a pulley system, are violent and visually shocking.

In the same space is Lu Zhengyuan’s Mental Patients and Lu Nan’s photographic documentation of Prison Camps in Northern Myanmar. Both works are concerned with telling the story of individuals on the margins of society — in the case of Zhengyuan, the mentally ill in China who have inadequate treatment options, overlooked as the nation forges forward without them. Nan alternatively explores the story and despondent experiences of the opium and heroin addicted prisoners in Myanmar.

Mental Patients © Lu Zhengyuan, 2006. All images courtesy of the artists and White Rabbit Gallery.

Lu Zhengyuan’s Mental Patients was created from memory after spending two weeks in a mental institution caring for an ill friend. Composed of fibreglass and grey paint, Zhengyuan’s seven patients are realistic, life-size human figures. While visitors are able to wander among the bodies sparsely positioned in a corner of the second floor, it is difficult to connect with them. These figures stare out and beyond, unaware of another presence. Bleak and disheveled in appearance, it is impossible not to feel the hopelessness of their predicament. One of the less familiar contemporary Chinese artists to be featured at White Rabbit, Zhengyuan’s Mental Patients is a surprisingly emotive work of art from a rising star.

Also among those that are less familiar are Jin Nü, a twenty-seven year old artist from Hebei, and Guo Fei, a young artist from Shanxi.  Jin Nü’s Exuviate II: Where Have All the Children Gone? and three works from Guo Fei’s Boxes series — Be Quiet, Autumn, and The Silence You Can Hear can be found on the first floor of White Rabbit. While visually distinct from each other and composed of varying media — installation and oil on wood respectively — the two works similarly consider the inevitable progression of life and societal development, commenting on the consequences such progression has had on their personal well-being and China’s ecological landscape.

In Jin Nü’s work, twenty small dresses of sheer starched silk hang unevenly from the gallery roof. While art critics interpreted the work to be a solemn comment on China’s one child policy, the translucent dresses functioning as a tribute to millions of female babies consequently killed or aborted, Jin Nü’s installation piece is really a meditation on her own lost childhood. Simultaneously nostalgic about the passing of time and unnerved by the harsh realities of adult life, Nü’s work represents her personal longing for the innocence and tenderness of young life, a stage she regretfully will never be able to return to.

Exuviate II: Where Have All the Children Gone © Jin Nu, 2005. All images courtesy of the artists and White Rabbit Gallery.

Similary, Guo Fei returns to memories of his childhood in Be Quiet, Autumn, and The Silence You Can Hear. Using wooden boxes as a base, a nod to the Chinese pastime of placing collected items in square wooden boxes, Fei paints his recollections of childhood, creating an odd collection of personal memories in the process. For the three works featured in Beyond the Frame, Fei presents the sublime and idyllic scenes of insects, wildlife and nature he remembers from his childhood. However, the impetus behind the three works of art is to pay homage to places that no longer exist — the passing of time and rapid urbanisation have seen these scenes replaced with sprawling suburban landscapes and cities. While reflecting on the loss of personal history, the only lasting remnants being intangible and vague memories, Fei also cleverly comments on the potential ecological disaster and destruction of cultural heritage continued urban expansion would result in.

With four floors of contemporary Chinese art on display, all unique in style and content, White Rabbit’s Beyond the Frame is well worth a visit. There truly is no other venue in the country that provides such a comprehensive look into the phenomenon that is contemporary Chinese art. Indeed, Beyond the Frame is yet another spectacular White Rabbit exhibition that affirms how phenomenal and multifaceted contemporary Chinese art practice currently is. Beyond the Frame is on display until December 31st, 2011. Admission is free.

All images courtesy of the artists and White Rabbit Gallery

The Mad Square: Impact of the Nazis

Monday, October 17th, 2011

Design for 'Adolf, the Superman: swallows gold and sprouts rubbish’, John Heartfield , 1932 © AGNSW, 2011

By Marietta Zafriakos

Artistic freedom, growth and experimentation had no place in the Third Reich.

How did any modern art survive the Third Reich?  The Mad Square: Modernity in German Art 1910-1937, is an exhibition of the extraordinary artistic diversity of 20th century German art at the Art Gallery of New South Wales. It’s quite remarkable to think of what these pieces have been through to be part of this exhibition.

The title of the exhibition refers to a 1931 painting by Felix Nussbaum of which the curator, Dr Jacqueline Strecker says, ‘can be seen as a satirisation of the collapse of society during the years of the Weimar Republic and as a forewarning of the cataclysm to come’. Regardless of what ‘mad square’ may have been: be it insanity in a public place, or fury within the frame of a painting, or perhaps something else as the Nazis began to take power, artists reacted in turmoil. Germany certainly was in the midst of it all. The clever title links the works in the exhibition with the ‘mad’ era of modernity in Germany.

The starting place for The Mad Square is Berlin, a century ago. In the heady years leading up to, and at the beginning of World War I, Germany became the epicentre for international avant-garde artists. Despite the economic instability of the early 1920s, Berlin re-established itself as the third largest city in Europe after Paris and London, a busy metropolis brimming with opportunity.

Jacqueline Strecker goes beyond the 14-year period of the Post World War I Weimar Republic from 1918 to 1933, exploring the impact of the new Nazi regime from 1933-37. Strecker explores movements of this period such as Expressionism, the Bauhaus group and Dada. These were movements that defied the aims of totalitarianism, and were completely forbidden, degraded, and censored by the Nazis. The exhibition features more than 200 works from collections around the world, with many by important artists of the period including Ernst Ludwig Kirchner, George Grosz, Otto Dix, Max Beckmann, Christian Schad and Hannah Höch. This exhibition exposes the effect Nazism had on German artists, as well as the complex ways in which these artists reacted to the changes of modernity.

The Mad Square attempts to investigate a large period, which at times can seem overwhelming. Because of this ambitious focus, the impact the Nazis had over German art may not at first seem obvious to viewers who do not have any knowledge of the history of the time. Ultimately, the exhibition examines a culture gripped between two catastrophic dramas, World War I and the establishment of the Nazi Third Reich. Furthermore, it explores the marginalisation of the arts during the rise of the Nazis, the ‘golden years’ of The Weimar Republic, and its inevitable fall. But is this exhibition a true representation of the impact of the Third Reich on modern art?

To offer some historical insight into early 20th century Berlin: they were a population traumatised by the impact of the war. The impact of hyperinflation triggering economic disaster. The Great Depression further devastated Weimar’s unstable life. Unemployment and poverty spread across Germany. The challenges of a turbulent society and the corruption of the Weimar period ultimately saw Hitler and his government gain popularity and seize power.

From 1924 onwards, the Nazis increasingly took control of regional governments, and in 1933, they triumphed nationally. The Nazis wasted no time in attacking what they perceived to be endangering their ideal of German culture: ‘immoral’ notions in the fields of art, literature, music and film. ‘The entire artistic and cultural stammering of the Cubists, Futurists and Dadaists is neither racially founded nor bearable as art for the people,’ said Joseph Goebbels, Hitler’s Minister of Propaganda. True art as outlined by Hitler was associated with the country life, a return to the past and with the Aryan racial ideology. Virtually all modern art was ‘degenerate’, the English translation of the German phrase, ‘entartete Kunst’. The allegedly ‘Jewish’ nature of art that was indecipherable, distorted, or that depicted ‘depraved’ subject matter was prohibited. It’s important to remember that during this time, one third of Berlin’s population were Jewish.

Modernism had no place in the Third Reich.

National Socialism tried to control German culture and how it was portrayed and perceived abroad. For example, one of the ways art reflected the Nazi political philosophy was by the tedious repetition of traditional landscape art. Artists glorified the German citizens, soldiers, and Hitler’s ideals.  Art was to portray Hitler as a hero who would cure all of Germany’s ills (may have misinterpreted this sentence). The notion of racial purity, manual labour, military heroism and portraits of the Führer were common.

The transformation of German art came with the expectation of all artists to join the Reichshulturkammer (Reich’s Culture Chamber.) In 1933 Hitler assigned Goebbels as the head of the Chamber, overseeing all art. By 1935, the Reich’s Culture Chamber had over 100,000 members. By now, the Nazis had a firm grasp on art, and made sure it functioned as indoctrinating people with warped Fascist ideology. Soon enough, the Nazi’s strict guidelines on the arts became part of the destruction and regulation of cultural life in Germany. In a broader sense, a major part of the Nazi attack on culture might be called a war against creativity and the vision of the other. It soon became clear that the task of art in the Third Reich was to mould people’s attitudes by carrying political messages with stereotyped concepts.

As they did with other parts of life, the Nazis changed the notion of German art to agree with, and strengthen, their belief system. Works of art during this period were derived from the classical style of Greece and Rome. Hitler chose classical art to be the style that the Nazis would emulate because he felt it epitomised a period of racial purity, before it had been ‘corrupted’ by Jewish influences. Hitler saw classical art a traditional period of great and strong empires, an ‘empire’ he wished to rule. Clearly these ideals of traditional art were far from the innovative art modernists had been aspiring to create. Even though only a few of the modern artists who had developed these new ‘degenerate’ styles were actually Jewish, the Nazis considered modern art to be the result of racial impurity.

In the Mad Square, a section titled ‘Art and Power’ concentrates solely on the rise of fascism, and the consequences for modern art in Germany. Munich’s Degenerate Art show in 1937 was perhaps the most indiscriminate of the Nazis’ raids against ‘un-German’ culture. Out of the 16000 sculptures, paintings, prints and books that were confiscated from museums and galleries during the Nazi regime, 650 of them were set aside for the ’Degenerate’ show. The goal was to ridicule and insult. Works selected for the show aimed to prove the mental deficiency and moral decay that had supposedly crept into modern German art. Artworks in various media were hung in a purposely crowded fashion. They were exhibited in rooms surrounded by many signs that announced things such as: “Revelation of the Jewish racial soul,” and “The Jewish longing for
the wilderness reveals itself – in Germany the Negro becomes the racial ideal of degenerate art.”

Over two million people visited the exhibition in Munich, while far fewer saw the Great German Art Exhibition held nearby in the Nazi-designed House of German Art, which sought to promote what the Nazis deemed as ‘healthy’ art. As well as filmed footage and documentation from the show, several of these ’degenerate’ works are included in the Mad Square exhibition to emphasise the creativity and diversity of modernism, in opposition to the derogatory ways in which the Nazis sought to scorn and destroy modern art.

Among the strongest images in the exhibition are the photomontages of John Heartfield. Heartfield was a communist who changed his name from Helmut Herzfelde. This was in part a way of protesting World War I; he even feigned madness to avoid returning to the service. Heartfield created images satirising Hermann Goering as a butcher in 1933, and Hitler, (pictured above) with a spine of gold coins. These images juxtapose the declarations of Nazi propaganda with the misery of widespread poverty.

Avant-garde German artists were branded both enemies of the state and a threat to German culture, so many went into exile. Max Beckmann fled to Amsterdam. Max Ernst immigrated to America with his then wife Peggy Guggenheim. Nussbaum was captured in Belgium. Kirchner committed suicide in Switzerland in 1938. Although officially no artists were killed because of their work, those of Jewish descent who did not escape from Europe in time were sent to concentration camps. Many parts of the world benefited from Europeans being forced to escape their homes. One of the Bauhaus artists featured in The Mad Square, Ludwig Hirschfeld, was forced to leave Germany due to his part-Jewish heritage. He was deported to Australia where he became an inspirational teacher at Geelong Grammar School and Melbourne University. Who knows what these artists may have accomplished if they did not have the threat of the Nazis looming over them?

After the Degenerate Art exhibit, works were sold at various auctions; some pieces were obtained by museums, others by private collectors. After the fall of Nazi Germany and the invasion of Berlin by the Red Army, some artworks from the exhibit were found buried. It is uncertain how many of these then reappeared in the Hermitage Museum in St Petersburg where they still remain. In 2010, as work began to develop on an underground line from Alexanderplatz through the city centre to the Brandenburg Gate, several sculptures from the Degenerate Art show were found in the cellar of a private house. These included the bronze cubist style statue of a female dancer by the artist Marg Moll, now on display at the Neues Museum, http://www.neues-museum.de/.

Who knows, maybe there are still hidden artworks to be found.

As unstable, corrupt, politically divided and ultimately doomed as the Weimar government was, it coincided – as Eric Hobsbawm writes in an essay reprinted in the catalogue – with an extraordinary eruption of cultural, literary and scientific activity in Germany, partly stirred by the idea of living on the edge of a catastrophe, in a world whose past had been obliterated and whose future was unknown.

Undoubtedly, the Third Reich had an immeasurable impact on 20th century German art. The Mad Square offers some insight into the consequences Hitler’s rise to power had on German artists. The full impact of the Nazis on art is not explored entirely however, as that is not the main focus. Instead, this exhibition highlights the diversity in the art produced during the rise and fall of Weimar.

It is understandable that viewers of the exhibition may have mixed responses aesthetically, morally and emotionally. Time distorts how we perceive things, and it is hard to imagine these great artists, or anyone, living under the struggles of the Nazi regime. Not only did the Nazis imprison and murder millions, they also tainted the potential of German artists through their oppressive regime. Their strict guidelines on the arts became part of the destruction and regulation of all cultural life in Germany.

In a section of the final room there is a small collection of works that survived the ‘degenerate’ art campaign, to commemorate modern artists and their contribution to art. Modernity brought artists together, and yet freed them due to the idea that society and their world had vanished by war, politics and technology. It is this legacy that the modern artists have left behind, rather than the impact of Hitler’s power on art.

The Mad Square, Art Gallery of NSW, Sydney, August 6th -November 6th

National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne, 25th November to 4th March.

In conjunction with The Mad Square exhibition, a program of theatre, music, film, exhibitions and discussions inspired by 1920s Berlin are being held around Sydney.

Image courtesy of the Art Gallery of New South Wales

Further reading

“The Coming of the Third Reich,” Richard J. Evans,

“The Rise of the Nazis,” Conan Fischer.

The Mad Sqaure Exhbition catalogue,

http://www.artgallery.nsw.gov.au/exhibitions/mad-square/