Posts Tagged ‘installation’

Jenny Tubby: The octagonal curiosity

Wednesday, May 30th, 2012

By Rebecca O’Shea


Artist in situ, Royal National Park, Photographer Sarah Miller, Courtesy of Jenny Tubby 2012

Jenny Tubby is the 2012 Artist in Residence at the Wollongong City Gallery, a residency that will cumulate in the exhibition Octagonal Rooms (26 May -26 August 2012). This opportunity provided Tubby the space and resources to see out an idea that was born in her final year of university. The genesis of this exhibition, now retitled the Original Room, was produced in 2009. It was first seen in the Wollongong University’s graduating exhibition of the same year, Grad Wrap, and in 2010 travelled to Perth for the National Graduate Show Hatched. Now executed in 2012, the original room is seen with many intriguing extensions.

(more…)

Monster mash

Tuesday, October 18th, 2011

By Liam Kane

Insect, animal and human hybrid freaks are projected onto the dark gallery wall; they begin dancing to the music of The Brutal Poodles, pair up and end up forming a circular orgy and then it’s all over. I’m trying to describe Sydney-based artist Deborah Kelly’s five animated collage characters and their performance in her projection work entitled Beastliness. This video, animated by Christain Hiennrich and Chris Wilson, accompanied an ongoing workshop collaboration project run by Kelly to construct the world’s largest collage, exhibited at Artspace in August. The exhibition, Make More Monsters, provided a lot to think about.

I am interested in the work of contemporary collage artists, and, despite the fact that Kelly does not exclusively work in collage, her current work seems to encapsulate all that excites me. Collage artists have the ability to synthesise society, the body and the world of images; and to reassemble them in a way that is profound and often amusing. Kelly’s work is unique. She has gathered and stored images since her teens and, over the years, has stitched them into characters that seem to reflect on the human body, our sexuality and where it is situated within the animal kingdom.

Kelly’s recent work is the latest development in a trajectory in art history that began with surrealists. It is easy to draw comparisons between Kelly’s work in this exhibition with books produced by the surrealist Max Ernst in the early twentieth century. The most striking similarities between the collages of Kelly and Ernst are the notions of creating human animal hybrids. Hybrids feature heavily in Ernst’s book Le Femme 100 Tetes (The Hundred Headless Women), published in 1927. Photographs of well-to-do people with their heads replaced by a hawk’s face or perhaps a moth’s abdomen are commonplace in Ernst’s graphic novels. Likewise, Kelly’s characters are odd amalgamations of animal and human limbs.

It’s a pleasure to see the legacy of the stranger and raunchier surrealists like Ernst in the work of contemporary artists. Kelly’s projection work seem to be close to how Ernst’s works would have looked, had they been animated. The two artists appear to operate in the same headspace when they create hybrid monsters, despite the 70 years that separates them.

I watched Kelly’s striking characters grind one another on the wall and laugh, understanding that I was observing some kind of absurd peep show. Maybe I was the butt of a joke. Don’t get me wrong, it was actually very funny, if somewhat awkward, to experience the characters’ performances, especially on my own. In hindsight, it was humorous to find myself shifting uncomfortably as the sexy-legged creatures began to copulate.

My response might have been part of the exhibition’s purpose: to make the viewer feel slightly uncomfortable yet still remain amused. This exhibition seemed to suggest that although the artwork has a great deal of depth, we don’t have to take it all seriously. The use of humour as a tool to provoke and engage with the audience has been a tactic of many collage artists.

The use of animation in Kelly’s exhibition can be placed in the context of the development of the collage aesthetic. The fusion of two-dimensional static collages and animation is one of the main attractions of this exhibition as contemporary collage is carving itself a new field in media arts. Kelly is well aware of and situated within this field.  The perverse characters, fixed onto hand-woven Italian paper neatly framed away from the projection, moved about their sexual performance in the stilted and jutted way that you would expect. Animation makes the imagined performance and dynamics of static collage works a reality.

Works such as Prey Tell Soft Suitor, 2009-2010, make a strong and direct point, especially after these creatures were animated: when it comes to sexuality, the line between humans and the animals becomes blurred. This may be why the video is entitled Beastliness.

Often such imagery in the collage aesthetic is criticised for being too direct. What is wrong with an artist being direct when it comes to expressing their ideas? Occasionally I think; enough with subtlety, give me eroticised body parts and lots of grinding if sex is what you’re talking about. Kelly ignores tendencies to be witty and subtle; an attitude which I cherish among collage artists.

There was more to this exhibition than the projection and analogue collages. Away from the screen a most engaging dynamic was revealed. A row of tables lined the back of the room where people had laboured over their own work using images provided by Kelly: I was standing in a workshop. Scattered unrelated images, rollers and glue and piles of heavy books lay about. The gallery space had become an artist’s studio. During the exhibition Kelly had run a series of workshops where the audience fixed their own collages on to a 10-metre long roll of paper. By the final week, the volume of work created by the audience was substantial and interesting. Kelly plays with a perception of collage as a scrapbook practice in which anybody could succeed because it does not require the same level of formal training as more established traditions such as drawing and painting. When the audience’s works were placed in this gallery context they gain certain legitimacy. Perhaps the participation element of Kelly’s installation is a way of combating restrictive views held about collage artists.

Collage is still widely considered to be a mere tool of the painter or illustrator, despite the fact that it has own distinct conceptual boundaries and an aesthetic entirely separate from these traditions. It is particularly relevant to the way we perceive our fractionalised world and has a capacity to provide a means for a visual interpretation of culture, society and politics.  Deborah Kelly’s exhibition represents the independence of collage as an art form and reveals its conceptually and aesthetically progressive nature. Collage is risky; it can be rude, sexualised, flirtatious, often humorous, and direct to the point. It always proclaims its own legitimacy as a unique practice.

Deborah Kelly: Make More Monsters, ARTSPACE, Sydney, 20 July – 21 August 2011.

Gunshot

Wednesday, November 3rd, 2010

Lunan Xing

The late 1980s in China was an age of innocence; a period where the government was liberalizing and commercial pressures had not yet come to dominate society. It was a period for enthusiasts, idealists and dreamers. In 1989, an art exhibition was held in the official national gallery. It was the first time contemporary artists had formed a group in China to appear in an official exhibition area. The young artists were so excited that they made numerous exotic modern works, including some kaleidoscopic performance works for the exhibition. The most eye-catching one was the historic ‘gunshot incident’.

On February 5, 1989, female artist Xiao Lu stood in front of her ‘Dialogue’ installation, which was made out of two telephone kiosks, and fired a gun at it. The exhibition was closed because of this ‘gunshot incident’. The artist Tang Song, partner of Xiao Lu, was arrested for owning firearms illegally. Xiao Lu reported herself to the police later on. The incident was so shocking that it covered the front page of various key newspapers, each with a varying interpretation of her actions. However, contemporary art is always accompanied by misreading.

The ‘gunshot incident’ could be described as announcing the end of an era. Idealism was ruined both in art and society in general. ‘They had a strong historical, political feeling to explain the work like this, but I just have some emotional obsessions at that time in my own female world, which seems too small for the male’, 1 said Xiao Lu years later. Back in 1989, Xiao had just graduated from college with a failed love, which made her believe that it was impossible to have an efficient dialogue between the two sexes. The ‘dialogue’ installation was created to express her personal feelings. The images of a female and a male were put separately inside the two telephone booths revealing their attempt to communicate with each other, while a microphone hung in between to show the failure of the conversation. The young artist at that time had no idea about performance art. She just wanted to destroy the installation in a speedy way to emphasize the idea of the work. A gun was an ideal method and available as she was the daughter of high-ranking officials.

After the bullets were shot on the exhibition, Tang Song, who actually wasn’t involved in the creation of the work, was arrested. Because of this, the two young artists fell in love with each other. Tang claimed himself as the creator of the artwork and interpreted it with the grand narratives from political, social and legal aspects. As both of the artists had high-ranking official family backgrounds, they were released after three days. Tang, who was experienced at talking in public, attracted considerable attention both from media reporters and art critics. Xiao, who loved Tang, chose to be silent.

The original intention of the work was to discuss the communication and paradox between two sexes, however what happened after the shot exceeded the expectations of everyone, including the artist herself. Tang and other critics perceived the work in a typical male-grand gesture way because of the political context. As a result of the failed communication and misunderstanding between each other, the original meaning was ignored and intentionally distorted. The female artist lost her voice. Fifteen years later, however, Xiao broke her silence to describe her original idea about the artwork in a letter also telling of her failed love affair with Tang, who had only loved himself and taken the gunshot performance from her. The tragic result of this love story forced Xiao to review the artwork, claim the sole right of the work and inspire her independence as an artist rather than just a lover of Tang.

In the long fifteen years, however, this artwork has always been accepted and explained by public from a political perception. ‘Dialogue’, no matter whether it was talking about the feminine private feelings or the masculine political metaphor, has exceeded the installation itself. All the issues surrounding the artwork can themselves be seen as performance art. Who was authorized to interpret the artwork? How many works in art history has been deprived its original meaning like this? Probably the process of continuing to question is the most meaningful thing.

Revelations at the Fair: Take a Ride on Brook Andrew’s ‘The Cell’.

Tuesday, October 12th, 2010

Katrina Dunn-Jones

Brook Andrew’s most recent work, The Cell, currently inhabits SCAF’s (the Sherman Contemporary Art Foundation) exhibition space. This inflated installation is certainly an experience to be had.

Upon entering the gallery one is immediately intrigued by this work. The strange buzzing sound of the air pump hits you first, creating a heightened awareness of the surroundings. As viewers continue into the space they are confronted by the colossal cell; a rectangular, inflated, pulsating structure, decorated with a red geometric pattern (inspired by Andrew’s Wiradjuri heritage).

As a sculpture, The Cell gives viewers a sense of wonder, however in this work they are invited to step into a Wiradjuri-patterned costume (and step out of their everyday identity) and participate in the work, as an installation. Stripped of an identity, or armed with a new one, participants enter The Cell by crawling through a narrow tunnel emerging to find a spacious, bouncy, rectangular room covered completely by a monochromatic geometric-psychedelic pattern.

Brook Andrew The Cell, 2010 dimensions variable Commissioned by Sherman Contemporary Art Foundation. Photos courtesy Paul Green

Entering The Cell is like ‘falling down the rabbit hole’ or opening the doors to Willy Wonka’s Chocolate Factory. It is a visually stimulating and exciting place. The unwritten instructions seem to be ‘let go’, ‘have fun’; run, jump, roll and ‘bash into stuff’ or just lie on the soft floor and relax while being subtly rocked by the movement of the cell. Adult participants are given the opportunity to leave the outside world behind and journey back to childhood.

Brook Andrew The Cell, 2010 dimensions variable Commissioned by Sherman Contemporary Art Foundation. Photo courtesy Roger D'Souza

However, this work is not as conceptually light as it first appears. There is a mournful and slightly malevolent undercurrent that acts as a subtext to the fun.  The colour and pattern of The Cell, as well as the inflatable, transient nature, references ‘the carnival’ or circus and the state of being at once pleasant and sinister. The title, Cell, refers to the most basic element of life, and the non-life of incarceration. The costumes donned by the participants are inscribed with a serial number, referencing prison uniforms. Where initially the costumes freed the participants of their identity, they end up oppressing them, robbing them of an identity. The general structure of the installation, punctuated by the gentle rocking motion and the inclusion of portholes bring the idea of asylum seekers (or ‘boat people’) to fore. After the novelty of ‘the jumping castle’ has worn off, the visitor can sit in this quiet space and mull over these ideas.

It was Andrew’s hope that this work would be ‘fun’, ‘provoke contemplation and discussion’ and ‘give a voice to the world’s forgotten people’. The Cell succeeds in its aim. It drew me in, I had loads of fun, and when that was over I sat down and put myself in the shoes of those who travel to Australia, in the hope that confinement will be replaced by freedom.

Brook Andrew: The Cell

Sherman Contemporary Art Foundation

16-20 Goodhope Street, Paddington

Sydney, NSW 2021.

Open Wednesday-Saturday 11am-5pm.